My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128459
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128459
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:25:35 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 6:10:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Determination of Hydrologic Consequences, Simons, Li & Associates
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 07 Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />to <br />The schematic flow diagram of the Magpie Creek watershed for present-mining <br />cronditions is shown in Figure 1. Individual subwatersheds within the G.E.C. <br />permit boundary for present-mining conditions are shown in Figure 2. For <br />present-mining conditions, the Tipple Area is represented by one subwatershed <br />unit and one reservoir unit; for post-mining conditions, it is represented by <br />one subvatershed unit. The Newlin Creek watershed was modeled assuming no dif- <br />' ference between the present- and post-mining conditions. The present-mining <br />' condition assumes that the Newlin Creek stream channel at the "Prospecting Pit" <br />area is reclaimed so that the existing culvert at the watershed outlet rnuld <br />be analyzed. A schematic flow diagram of the Newlin Creek watershed is <br />C presented in Figure 3. <br />In the Preliminary Data Base Report, the watershed segmentation of the <br />Magpie Creek drainage for post-mining conditions assumed that the channels would <br />r ba restored to their original bed slopes, cross-sectional shapes, and alignment. <br />• This condition also assumed that the Dorchester Mine area had been reclaimed <br />and the Magpie Creek diversion within Dorchester's permit boundary had been <br />restored to its natural conditions. State officials stated that the Magpie <br />Creek diversion channel within Dorchester's permit boundary was a permanent <br />diversion, and therefore, would not need to be restored to its original char- <br />. nel shape, slope, and alignment. In addition, the area within G.E.C. Minerals, <br />inc. permit boundary will be reclaimed before the Dorechestez Nine area. Due <br />to these reasons, the watershed segmentation of the Magpie Creek drainage for <br />post-mining conditions had to be changed to reflect this situation. Figure 4 <br />is a schematic flow diagram of the Magpie Creek drainage reoresentinq these <br />changes. Table 3 presents the watershed geometry for all units which have <br />changed in the Magpie Creek drainage for post-mining conditions. <br />2.5 Typographical Corrections for Preliminary Data Hase Report <br />In the report entitled "Preliminary Data Base for Application of MULTSED <br />Program, G.E.C. Minerals, Inc., Florence, Colorado," there are a few corrections <br />that need to be made. Following is a list of corrections. <br />1. Page 15 - three existing sediment pond structures should read four <br />• existing pond structures. <br />2. Page 20 - The values for Sw-lOL and Sw-lOR should be interchanged. <br />3. Page 25 - Sediment Pond "D" should read Sediment Pond "T". <br />' 4.' Page 28 - CH-17; 4.002 should be 4.022. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.