My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128113
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:25:15 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 5:39:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Soil and Vegetation Inventory Revegetation Research on the Proposed Keenesburg Surface Coal Mine
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix L-1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For 12-inch penetration: <br />Number of observations ------------- 20 <br />Mean force applied ----------------- j3 pounds <br />Standard,deviation --------------- 8 pounds <br />Penetration was most difficult at depths of 4 to 8 inches; thereafter, <br />the force required for further penetration generally decreased. <br />Spade. A narrow S-inch aide by 16-inch long spade was also used to <br />measure penetration. The procedure was to place the spade in a vertical <br />position then to stand upon the spade slowly so as to apply a near static <br />pressure, Depths of spade penetration were measured on the mulch-compari- <br />son plots and on the reference area, as follows: <br />For mulch-comparison plots: <br />~ Number of observations ------------ 20 <br />Penetration ------------------------ 6 inches <br />Standard deviation ----------------- 0.7 inch <br />' For reference area: <br />Number of observations ----------- 20 <br />Penetration --------------------- 12.4 inches <br />Standard deviation ---------------- 1.5 inches <br />~ The maximum penetration achieved on mulch-comparison plots xas 8 <br />inches; xhereas, the maxitlum achieved on the reference area xas 16 inches. <br />A shoving motion while standing on the spade pushed it to full depth on <br />the reference area, but seldom to more than 8 inches on the mulch- <br />comparison plots. <br />The spade test would be most readily used to monitor compaction on <br />~ reclaimed mine areas. <br />DEMONSTRATION OF COt~ACTION <br />The spade test was used to demonstrate sand compaction to John Nelson <br />on April 14, 1980, and to Bob Sill in, Ton Conley and Darryl Arnold on <br />t4ay 14, 1980. <br />RIPPING <br />Although sand compaction during reclamation should be either prevented <br />or corrected before seeding, it would be good to knox whether or not <br />satisfactory results could be obtained by ripping after seeding. For that <br />reason, we had Darryl Arnold rip the west set of mulch-comparison plots <br />(plots 1-6) on May 14, 1880, when the sand xas moist, and the east set <br />(plots 1}-18) on June 18, 1980, xhen the sand was dry. His ripper penetrated <br />to a depth of about 20 inches with ripper teeth spaced 19 inches. Ripping <br />uprooted some of the plants amd lifted the soil surface 5-6 inches. Uproot- <br />ing appeared cost severe with ripping when the sand xas dry. A moderate <br />degree of recovery, mostly by sand dropseed, had been obtained by June 14 <br />• and further recovery by August 25 on plots ripped when the sand was moist. <br />Further observations of recovery are needed in 1981 and subsequent years. <br />~~ <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.