My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128085
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:25:13 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 5:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/19/1999
Doc Name
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE ADEQUACY OF THE APPLICATION
From
GENERAL CHEMICAL SODA ASH PARTNERS CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• CChem ~Il • <br />90 East }falser Road <br />Parsippany, aJ 070ii <br />Tel: 973515.0900 <br />FiECEIVEQ <br />May 17, 1999 <br />MAY 19 1999 <br />Va Federal Express <br />Mr. Allen Sorenson <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />pivision of Minerals 6 Gen~ogy <br />RE: Adequacy of the Application, Yankee Gulch Project, File No. M-99-002 (American <br />Soda) - Second Comment Submittal <br />Dear Mr. Sorenson: <br />We have reviewed the information provided by American Soda ("Applicant"). Based <br />upon our review, we object to the issuance of this permit. As of this writing, the Applicant has <br />not satisfied the issues outlined in the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology ("DMG") <br />letter dated April 18, 1999 (RE: Adequacy of the Application, Yankee Gulch Project, File No. <br />M-99-022). The Applicant therefore, has failed to meet the minimum regulatory requirements of <br />the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act for permit issuance. If the DMG feels otherwise, <br />kindly contact us by telephone immediately to draw to our attention the manner in which the <br />inadequacies of the Applicant's permit application were met. <br />We have also reviewed the various supplementary information provided by Applicant <br />subsequent to the DMG's April 18, 1999 letter. Based on this information we object to a permit <br />issuance. In addition to our comment letter dated May 12, 1999, we offer this document to <br />express our serious concerns about the inadequacies contained within the Applicant's <br />supplementary information. Specifically, these concerns primarily relate to the intended <br />groundwater and surface monitoring plan. <br />General Chemical is in a unique position to evaluate the technical basis for this permit <br />application and provide assistance to the DMG and the Applicant. As you may be aware, General <br />Chemical has been successfully solution mining halite in an environmentally safe manner since <br />1918 in Amherstburg, Ontario. We are considered to be one of the leading industry pioneers and <br />have developed an extensive database of information on drilling, cavity and well development and <br />subsurface subsidence monitoring. To the extent our concerns remain unresolved we intend to <br />draw on expert testimony to argue the inadequacies of the reclamation permit application. <br />Accordingly, we offer the following guidance: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.