Laserfiche WebLink
1?. flu I)it isiun ha. rnclsssrd a raps of thr stlticial neap ul Ihr adjasxnt Lu~tut <br />v~utntty(tprratiunt.\1-Is)'K-_'~3s)).I~s+kc.(ir;nrl I'it. I'Irasrrlrarl) illuslrntrthr <br />luratiun nt" thr prstpstsrd \1\1M 1'nnncrhip (;ratcl Pit in rclaliun Irs thr l;ul.r> <br />c ir,+vrl Pil un Ihr s;unr map ts+ drntonstralr thst thr permit Ixxutdarir~ ul thcac <br />two +sprruiun. do not u~rrlap. <br />l3 rav Orr. OiJertpr of the MD.i\1 hermit, me; w;U~ JMG staff on site and reviewed the <br />boundari«a of the Kokes Gravel Pit m rela;ion to the MMM proposed permit. h was <br />confirmed that the MMM permit will not overlap the existing Kokes Gravel Pit. GPS <br />coordinates were taY.en ai the existing boundary posts o(the Kokes permit and the MMM <br />Permit. It was noted that the boundary poste on the Southern boundares of the Kokes permit <br />do not correspond with the survey map provided. but the NorthlNortheast boundaries match. <br />The NorthlNortheast boundaries are the most rmporrant in this given situation. This provides <br />proof thal there will not be any overlapping of the two permits. Note the attached map. <br />I will hr hand drlitrrin~ thi. slocuntrnt anJ rncls+.urr> ts. coon ullirr un thr nx+rning <br />ul' lunr'tt"'. lh:utk :uu tisr ~nur Uturnu~h rrt tree u(thr application and ter look <br />li~n~urd lsr )our pusilitr rr.pssnar <br />Sinrrrrly. <br />~ ~~ / <br />\iark Ks+kr>. tiP <br />\I~I\1 I'anncrship <br />