My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE127103
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE127103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:24:14 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 4:17:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/23/2006
Doc Name
Clear Creek District Water Providers LLCs Answer to Cross Claim
From
Bjork Lindley Little
To
CMLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br />Claimant makes its cross claims, by its attorneys, Bjork Lindley Little PC, responds to the <br />numbered allegations set forth in the Cross Claim of Black Hawk-Central City Sanitation District <br />as follows: <br />A. ANSWER TO PRELIMINARY ALLEGATIONS OF THE CROSS CLAIM <br />1. In response to the allegations of Paragraph 1 of the Cross Claim, Clear Creek <br />incorporates by reference and hereby reasserts its responses to the allegations in Paragraphs 1, 2, <br />6, 7, 8 and 10 of the Complaint which were set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 and 10 of its <br />Answer to the Complain[. <br />2. Clear Creek lacks information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations of <br />Pazagraph 2 of the Cross Claim, and therefore denies it. <br />3. Clear Creek denies the allegation of Paragraph 3 of the Cross Claim. <br />4. Clear Creek Clear Creek denies the allegations of Pazagraph 4 of the Cross Claim. <br />Clear Creek avers that Construction Material Rule ("C.M.R.") 2.8.2 speaks for itself, that C.R.S. <br />§ 34-32.5-105 speaks for itself, and that the remainder of Pazagraph 4 states a legal conclusion. <br />5. Clear Creek denies the allegations of Paragraph 5 (numbered as a second <br />Paragraph 4 in the Cross Claim) of the Cross Claim. <br />ANSWER TO DEFENDANT CROSS CLAIMANT'S CLAIMS FOR RELIEF <br />6. In response to Paragraph 6 (numbered 5) of the Cross Claim, Clear Creek <br />incorporates its responses to Paragraphs 1 through 5 of the Cross Claim, as though fully set forth <br />herein. <br />7. In response to Paragraph 7 (numbered 6) of the Cross Claim, Clear Creek denies <br />that the Plaintiffs have been adversely affected or aggrieved by the action of the MLRB. <br />7.A. In response to Paragraph 7.A. (numbered 6.A.) of the Cross Claim, Clear Creek <br />denies the first sentence of that paragraph. Clear Creek admits that the Waste Water Treatment <br />Plant is a significant, valuable and permanent manmade structure. Clear Creek denies the <br />remaining allegations of that Paragraph. <br />7.B. In response to Paragraph 7.B. (numbered 6.8.) of the Cross Claim, Clear Creek <br />denies all of the allegations of that Paragraph. <br />8. In response to Paragraph 8 (numbered 7) of the Cross Claim, Clear Creek denies <br />all of the allegations of that paragraph. <br />8.A. In response to Paragraph 8.A. (numbered 7.A.) of the Cross Claim, Clear Creek <br />denies all of the allegations of that Paragraph. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.