Laserfiche WebLink
Third Park Federal Coal Exploration License Environmental Assessment <br />WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS <br />Affected Environment: There are no Wild and Scenic Rivers in the vicinity of the Proposed <br />Action. <br />Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: There would be no environmental consequences <br />associated with this resource. <br />Under the No Action Alternative, there would be no effects to designated Wild and Scenic Rivers. <br />WILDERNESS <br />Affected Environment: There are no Wilderness Areas in the vicinity of the Proposed Action. <br />Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: There would be no environmental consequences <br />associated with this resource. <br />Under the No Action Alternative, there would be no effects to Wilderness or Wilderness Study Areas. <br />NON-CRITICAL ELEMENTS <br />SOILS (includes a finding on Standard I) <br />Affected Environment: Soils in the Project Area are described in the Soil Survey of the San <br />Miguel Area, Colorado, Parts of Dolores, Montrose, and San Miguel Counties (NRCS 1986). Soils in the <br />Project Area have developed from a combination of residual, colluvial, and alluvial materials derived <br />from local bedrock. The Dakota, Morrison, Wasatch, and Chinle Formations have all been eroded and <br />weathered over time. The San Miguel, Coal Draw, and other streams subsequently have transported their <br />sediment into the Third Park area, and these sediments have the composition of the modem quaternazy <br />soils. Collectively, these lithologic bodies would contribute alight-colored, sand-dominated composition <br />including some fine, variegated silt and clay and possibly some coal fragments. <br />The soil mapping survey identified eight map units within the license area. The map unit name, <br />percentage coverage within the CEL, dominant soil series, relative depth, location on the landscape, <br />surface runoff, shrink-swell potential, and suitability for roads as described in the soil survey are shown in <br />Table 4. <br />The Project Area is in an azea primarily consisting of Barx-Progresso complex with 3 to l2 percent <br />slopes. Pinon-Bowdish-Rock outcrop complex with 3 to 30 percent slopes and Mikim loam with I to 6 <br />percent slopes are [he next two most dominant soil types in the area (NRCS 2007). The Barx-Progresso <br />complex is a moderate to very deep well-drained soil that is formed in alluvium derived from sandstone <br />or limestone. The permeability of this soil is moderate to moderately slow. <br />Surface runoff from most of the soils in the Project Area is very high. Soils on steeper slopes have slower <br />infiltration rates, resulting in more surface flow and erosion. The shrink-swell potential for most soils in <br />the Project Area is moderate to low, based on the amount and type of clay minerals found in the soil. The <br />finer texture soils have a higher shrink-swell hazard rating. Most soils in the area are moderately to poorly <br />suited for roads. Fair performance off road would be expected, but some reclamation may be needed. The <br />poorly suited areas may also require reclamation. <br />Weslern Fuels CEL Environmenm! Assessment l 9 <br />