Laserfiche WebLink
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • ~ Z~_~~ • <br />S ~: EXHIBIT J <br />VEGETATION INFORMATION <br />Affected lands for the Yankee Gulch Project include the solution mining well field and <br />the initial processing plant area at the Piceance Site, a 50-foot-wide permanent corridor <br />along the 44-mile-long pipeline route, and the final processing plant area at the <br />Parachute Site. <br />Vegetation communities occurring within the affected Bureau of Land Management <br />(BLM) lands and private lands to about 5 miles south of the Rio Blanco County-Garfield <br />County line have been classified and mapped by the BLM (BLM 1998). Vegetation data <br />were mapped on USGS 7.5 minute quadrangles using Geographical Information System <br />(GIS), and the maps were then used to identify vegetation communities and to calculate <br />the acreage of each vegetation type within this portion of the affected lands. Similar <br />detailed information is not available for the rest of the affected lands, which includes <br />the southern approximately 11 miles of the pipeline corridor and the Parachute Site in <br />Garfield County. Information on vegetation types occurring along the proposed project <br />pipeline corridor not covered by BLM GIS mapping was taken from environmental <br />assessments for two natural gas pipelines that the project pipeline corridor would <br />largely parallel (Barrett 1994, CIG 1995). Additional information on local plant <br />communities is presented in the BLM White River Resource Area Draft Resource <br />Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (BLM 1994) and the Phyto- <br />Edaphic Classification of the Piceance Basin (Tiedeman and Terwilliger 1978), in which <br />plant communities are described in terms of the overall ecosystem, including species <br />composition, soil type, climate, and other information such as land use, reclamation <br />limitations, and revegetation requirements. <br />For conciseness, the detailed classification scheme used for the GIS mapping and the <br />somewhat broader classification scheme used by Tiedeman and Terwilliger have been <br />summarized into the broader plant associations presented in the BLM Resource <br />Management Plan (BLM 1994). For example, there are 48 BLM GIS mapping categories <br />for pinyon-juniper-dominated communities, based on variations in percent canopy <br />cover and various subdominant cover types. Likewise, Tiedeman and Terwilliger <br />identify three categories for pinyon-juniper-dominated communities, based on <br />elevation, soil type, and dominant understory cover types. For this analysis, <br />information from both sources has been combined and summarized to describe, in <br />genera], the plant communities occurring within the affected lands. Table J-1 provides a <br />summary of the areal extent of major vegetation associations within the affected lands. <br />Because the Piceance Site will support all the project mining activities, it is the project <br />area that will experience the greatest disturbance to vegetation, and, therefore, a <br />vegetation map of the Piceance Site is also provided in Figure J-1. The table and the <br />vegetation map of the Piceance Site summarize information compiled in the process of <br />J-1 <br />