Laserfiche WebLink
Holly Bnllnuuid • • Page ? <br />Mubile Prnmi.~~ Concrete. Inc Mtn' 22, 2000 <br />IRA-A. The plume follows the First Creek paleochannel, which Flows northwest from <br />the RMA toward the South Platte River and is northeast of the Tanabe property. <br />The Tanabe property is in what the TCHD refers to as "the gap," or the at'ea between <br />the northern DIMP plume fringe area and northwest DIMP fringe area shown in Figure <br />I. The fringe area is shown on the US Army and TCHD DIMP distribution maps to be <br />hydt'ologicallycoenected to the South Platte River (Figure 3). According to most recent <br />1998 analytical data and plume maps provided by TCHD, the ground water beneath the <br />norYheas[ern'/z of [he property does no[ have detectable DIMP concentrations. Only the <br />southwestern''/x of the property lies over the fringe area, i.e., areas where DIMP was <br />detected in ground water but did not exceed CGWS. Based on ground water elevation <br />and plume maps, the northern DIMP plume is located hydrologically cross gradient <br />from the Tanabe property. <br />Ground Water Quality <br />D/MP Concentrations. TCHD monitors ground water quality in the Offpost Study <br />Areas for DIMP in both domestic and irrigation wells. According [o TCHD, DIMP <br />currently found in ground water itt the Offpost Study Area is remnant of pre- <br />containment/treahnen[ concentrations because the source of DIMP for the Offpos[ <br />Study Area is removed by [he containmendtreatment systems. In the absence of a <br />DIMP source, it is unlikely that DIMP concentrations would increase under current <br />ground water Flow conditions. <br />The TCHD has also confirmed that the three existing alluvial wells on the Tanabe <br />property (485A, 485B, and 485 C) have been sampled. Because well 485A was once <br />used for drinking water, it has been sampled the most frequently. The three wells have <br />not had DIMP concentrations that exceed 1.3 µg/L since 1990. DIMP concentrations in <br />well 485B may have exceeded the CGWS in 1985. The detection limit used in 1985 <br />(10 µg/L) was above the CGWS. A fourth well is an irrigation well designated as 485D <br />and has never been sampled. <br />Analytical data obtained from three wells located hydrologically upgradient from the <br />Tanabe property show recent concentrations below the CGWS and consistent decreases <br />in DIMP concentrations since 1985, consistent with the original design intentions of the <br />RMA corrective action measures. A summary of obtained ground water quality data is <br />shown in Table I with ground water contours and well locations shown in Figure 4. <br />The decreasing concentrations are consistent with the decrease in size of both the DIMP <br />plume fringe area as well as the northern DIMP plume depicted on maps obtained from <br />the TCHD and the U.S. Army from 1995 and 1997. The maps also show the northern <br />plume following the First Creek paleochannel, north of the Tanabe property. <br />In 1998. TCHD sampled the surface water discharging from two gravel pits located <br />northwest of the Tanabe property and within the plume fringe areas. The first pit, <br />located southwest of the intersection of Brighton Road and 120'" Street, discharged <br />water to the South Platte River a[ an estimated 30 gpm. DIMP concentration of the <br />discharge was 2.3 µg/L. A second, larger gravel pit dewatering operation located south <br />of [he first pit, closer to the plume, discharged water into [he South Platte River at an <br />estimated 8 to 10,000 gpm. No DIMP concentrations were detected in this discharge. <br />ERO <br />Resources <br />Corporation <br />