Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br />• wells were drilled with a 7-7/8 inch bit and completed with 2-3/8 inch O.D. <br />PVC casing and machine slot screen (.010 inch slot size). All screened <br />intervals were gravel packed with 10-20 sieve size silica sand. A seal of <br />bentonite pellets was placed above the gravel pack. The wells were developed <br />with air and by pumping for one to three hours each. The maximum yield <br />obtained from any well was approximately 5 gpm. None of the wells were <br />pumping clear water at the end of development. <br />The permanent wells, YAW-1, YAW-2, YAW-3, YAW-5 and YAW-6 will have cement <br />collars and steel casing with locking caps installed around them. The <br />remaining wells will be abandoned in accordance with the approved plan. <br />Hydrogeology <br />In the wells drilled in March 1982, the thickness of the alluvium ranged <br />from 10 to 18 feet. The depth to water ranged from 1 to 9 feet yielding a <br />saturated thickness of approximately 5 to 10 feet. Cross-section A-A' <br />shows that the bedrock surface under the Big Bottom area is relatively flat <br />and lacking significant buried channel features. <br />Oue to access problems from wet ground conditions, the pumping test of well <br />YAW-5 has not yet been performed. However, wells YAW-2, YAW-3, YAW-4, <br />YAW-6 and YAW-7 were slug tested. The slug tests were performed on 16 <br />March 1982. The tests were performed in the same manner as the Williams Fork <br />. slug tests. The results of the slug testing are presented on Table 2. Where <br />the data did not appear to be in accordance with what the theory would <br />( indicate for a particular method, the results of that method were not used. <br />The permeabilities individual wells obtained from this testing ranged from <br />26 to 280 gpd/ft2 and averaged 120 gpd/ft2. The calculated transmissivities <br />ranged from 200 to 1900 gpd/ft and averaged 900 gpd/f t. These permeabilities <br />are higher than those found in the Williams Fork alluvium; however, the <br />Yampa River alluvium is less clayey. Therefore, the calculated permeabilities <br />and transmissivities seem reasonable. <br />Summar <br />The Yampa River alluvium in the Big Bottom area is 10 to 18 feet thick <br />consisting mainly of poorly sorted silty sand to cobble sized materials <br />overlain by sandy silt. The saturated thickness was approximately 5 to 10 <br />feet in March 1982. The permeability and transmissivity calculated from <br />slug test data averaged 120 gpd/f t2 and 900 gpd/ft respectively. <br /> <br /> <br />