My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE126870
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE126870
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:24:01 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/18/2001
Doc Name
Concerns Regarding Application
From
Sage Hill Farm
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Cynthia Parker <br />Mitigation Possibilities <br />July 13, 2001 <br />Page 7 <br />There is a wide variety of actions which could be taken to avoid or mitigate the adverse <br />impacts identified above. We have not investigated the technical or economic feasibility <br />of these suggestions, but we are aware that they have been implemented in various <br />locations for various purposes. Some examples aze identified below, but this list should <br />not be understood to be either comprehensive or complete - there are certainly many <br />other possibilities which aze not mentioned here. <br />• One option which should be evaluated carefully would be the possibility of changing <br />from the "dry mining" process specified in the application to a "wet mining" process. <br />This would avoid the need for significant and long term dewatering activities, such <br />that many of the impacts described above could be avoided altogether. <br />• Consideration should be given to carrying out the mining activities over a shorter <br />duration, requiring a shorter period of dewatering activities as well (if the "dry mining <br />process" is to be used.) The application indicates that the mining activities may take <br />place over a period of 20 years or longer. This appears to us to be a relatively slow <br />rate of exploitation of the resource. <br />• Other options include construction of subsurface water barriers (e.g. slurry <br />trench/walls, etc) around the azeas to be dewatered, and/or aquifer recharge facilities. <br />These would be designed to maintain existing groundwater conditions in azeas of <br />concern. <br />We hope that you find these comments to be useful. Please do not hesitate to contact us <br />if there is any way in which we can be of assistance to you. <br />Sincerely, <br />Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, Inc. <br />by: <br />Jo H. Gerstle <br />Attachments: Figure 1 <br />Figure 2 <br />Figure 3 <br />cc: Ms. Lori Potter, Esq. <br />Dr. David Cooper <br />Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, 1002 Walnut Suite 200, Boulder, CO 80302 <br />DacumenQ CIU3ATEO July 12, 2001 12:08 PM, PRIMED. July 13, 2001 00.52 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.