My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE126257
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE126257
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:23:31 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 3:10:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 9A FISH & WILDLIFE APPENDIX PART 2 OF 3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Pennakl 1973) has listed r <br />( anges of densities found in Rocky Mountain streams <br />in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana. These range from approximately <br />50 to 1800 organisms per m 2. In Colorado, ranges xere from approximately 200- <br />1,000 with associated biomass of approximately 1.6 - 12 g/m2. The Crystal <br />River, which is a drainage ,lust over McClure 's Pass from the North Fork,had an <br />average density of 188 (range approximately 50-600) from 4 stations sampled 5 times <br />over a May-September period in 1972. Corresponding biomass ranged from 0.4 - <br />17.6 g/r.2. By comparison, densities found at the North Fork (averages of 2-3 <br />samples/station) ranged from 700- 14,000 when chironomids and ceratopogonids <br />were included, or approximately 300- 5,000 per m2 when they were not*. <br />This indicates relatively high densities of organisms in the North Fork. <br />Biomass estimates were only available for the March & July samplings ir. the <br />• present study. In March these values ranged ~'imarily from 4-13 g/m2 with one <br />* <br />outstandingly high value of 70 g/m <br />In July-, corresponding to the drop in numbers of organisms, the biomass <br />estimates were lower, ranging from 0.3 - 6.2 g/m2. Thus biomass estimates <br />for the North Fork, were within the range of those Found for the Crystal River and <br />other Colorado mountain streams (xith the exception of the 70 g/m2 value). However <br />the overall average biomass/m2 x2s 2-4 times higher for the North Fork than for <br />the Crystal (2.4 g/m2for Crystal vs 5.5 & 9.8 g/m2for the North Fork, without <br />or with the 70 g value.) <br />* wo^}: or. the Crystal River did not indicate many chironomids and ceratopogor.ids <br />This may have been a function of sampling technique. <br />• this latter figure was principally due to very high levels of caddisflies (which <br />included cases) and snails. These two groups contributed 760 ~ 8o to the 70 g/mz total. <br />~ ~ Thorne, '-973 <br />=.. <br />5-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.