My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE125988
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE125988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:23:17 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 2:42:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/17/1993
Doc Name
Annual Hydrologic Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1992 Report Section 2.5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Third White Sandstone aquifer well GP9 field pH values are • <br />typically near neutral. <br />The alluvial (P1), Lewis Shale (P8), Second White (P5), and <br />Third White Sandstone (P8) wells in Pyeatt Gulch all contain water <br />with field pH that i.s generally near neutral. <br />The 1992 values for alluvial wells .J1 and COY were near <br />neutral. The field pH values for well 81-03a have been near 8.5, <br />while the pH values ,for the GLUX-1 well are near 8.0. <br />3.4 SAR <br />The sodium-.adsorption ratio (SAR) is tabulated on the seconrl <br />series of pages in Table B-?, starting on Pae:e B-77. The SAR <br />values measured fer water from well GA1 and GA2 are low with an • <br />average value of a few tenths. SAR values for water from well GB2' <br />are typically slight,:ly less than one. The SAR from well GB5 was <br />typically less than 10 prior to 1985. The last seven years have <br />seen an increase in the SAR value to its 1992 value of 26. <br />The SAR of water frorn wells GC1, GC2 and GC3 have been <br />typically near 2. No definite trends are shown by the data. <br />The Twenty Mi1e~ Sandstone water (well GDi) has had variable <br />SAR values from O.5 to 4.4. A trend does not exist. but some of <br />the variation could have been affected by the length of pumpine. <br />prior to sampling. The SAR from well GD2 has generally been close <br />to 0.5. Bar_k£i11 well GD3 seems to contain water with .a similar <br />SAR value. <br />The early SAR v:slues from well GE1 were close to 20, while the • <br />3-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.