Laserfiche WebLink
r~ <br />~~ <br /> declined approximately 15 feet during 1988 and remained low until <br /> 1990. This response reflects the drier conditions with some <br /> increase in rer_harce in 1990. The rate of water-level decline in <br /> 1992 for we 11 GP5 was similar to that observ=:d in 1990 and the <br /> first half of 1991. The rate of decline was larger in the second <br /> ha1£ of 1991 to early 1992. W?11 GP6, completed in the 9R aquifer. <br /> is lor_ated approximately 4700 feet south of weli GP5. taster-level <br /> elevatlon versus tlme 1s pre-er.ted 1n F1?ure A-~'7. Overall w.3 ter <br /> levels have dropped slightly in the 9.R sauif~r at GPS since <br /> September 1987, but the decline is small r_emn3r~d to the change in <br /> well GP5. Water levels in the 9R aquifer .at well GPE appear to be <br /> less sensitive to chances in recharge than at well GP5. <br />• Water-Level elevations versus time for wel.i GP7 are presented <br /> on Figure A-28. Levels have shown fairly littiL> change since 1985, <br /> but water levels had been gradually declining t:he last three years <br /> prior to becoming steady in 1992. <br /> Figure A-29 prPSents the water-level elevation versus time <br /> data £or well GPB. WeII GP8 is completed in the KLM aquifer <br /> approximately 25 feet away from well GP7 (HI aqui£er1. Water level <br /> changes in well l',PL~ compare well with KLM aq~_ii`er w?11 GA2. taster <br /> level chances for well GP4 had .3iso been similar until water levels <br /> rose in 1990. Ail of these chances are thoueht, to be reflective of <br /> natural variations in the KLM .3qui£er. Water-level data for well <br /> GP8 is tabul.3ted in Table A-8. Wat?r-level ?l~ev.3tions £o~- we'1 GP9 <br /> ure 9-30. Levels were £airl}% ste.adv in *aeil GP9 <br />=_re shown on Fie <br />• _ <br /> ±hrnuch 1987. In 1988 and 1989 the water level dropped <br />2-li <br />