My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-06-02_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2006-06-02_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2019 9:19:19 AM
Creation date
11/25/2007 2:28:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/2/2006
Doc Name
2.04-136 Thru 2.04-161
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04.10 Vegetation Information
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />samples at the time of collection in order to evaluate sample size and sample adequacy. In the <br />laboratory, all samples were uniformly dried at 105 C for 24 hours. Oven-dried samples were <br />weighed to the neazest milligram. Mean production estimates were calculated for each species or <br />species group for each vegetation community. <br />Sample adequacy was determined at the time of sampling. The equation used for evaluating sample <br />adequacy is from the OSM guideline, A Statistical Evaluation of Revegetation Success on Coal <br />Lands in the West (Lazson 1980), and is as follows: <br />tz s1 <br />m= a <br />D <br />where: <br />m = the minimum number of observations needed <br />t = a table value (t distribution) for a given level of confidence <br />s1 = the variance estimate <br />D = the level of accuracy desired for the estimate of the mean <br />1982 Dry Meadow hegetation Communily Resamplinp <br />After review the 1980 dry meadow data, the OMLR requested changes in the delineation of the dry <br />meadow reference area. The larger dry meadow reference azea (Map 44) was then resampled in <br />1982. The dry meadow affected area was also resampled at the same time. Herbaceous cover, <br />• shrub cover, shrub density, and production were all sampled using the same methods used in 1980. <br />Statistically adequate sample sizes were obtained for cover, production, and shrub density for all <br />four areas sampled (Table 24). Sample adequacy calculations for the dry meadow community are <br />based on the 1982 data. Calculations for the oakbrush community aze based on the 1980 data. <br /> <br />1.04-198 Revised November 2004 PRIO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.