My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE125751
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE125751
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:23:06 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 2:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/13/1997
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 13 Portal Stability Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with embedded claystone and sandstone fragments in sizes ranging <br />from gravel to boulder-sized pieces. The slope-wash was underlain by <br />hard sedimentary bedrock consisting of sandstone and shales. <br />3. At Portal P3 the typical spoil consisted of a clayey gravel (GC). The <br />typical spoil at Portal R1 classifies as a clay, borderline clayey sand <br />(CL-SC). The finer nature of the R1 typical spoil is attributed to the 10- <br />footthick clay slope-wash layer present in the test pit at this location. <br />Overall, the typically spoil from R1 showed slightly lower strengths <br />than the typical spoil from P3 which is to be expected considering the <br />higher clay content. The friction angles for the two types of typical <br />spoil were generally consistent at different degrees of compaction, the <br />cohesion varied depending on the degree of compaction. The lowest <br />strength value measured was a friction angle of 28 degrees with a <br />cohesion of 400. <br />4. The stability of seven sections through the proposed portal areas were <br />analyzed. The results of the stability analysis indicate factors of safety <br />which significantly exceed the 1.3 minimum required by regulation. We <br />believe the post-mining topography results in a stable configuration. <br />Significant water build up within the reclaimed areas is not anticipated. <br />• Provision of a drain across the portal areas to prevent excessive water <br />build up in the area is recommended. <br />5. There is a potential for some seepage out of the portal areas. For this <br />reason we recommend that a drain system be installed across the front <br />of the portals. Our calculations indicate that a gravel section of 12 <br />square feet is capable of conveying flows in excess of 25 gallon per <br />minute. The drain should be sloped at a minimum 1 percent slope to <br />daylight. <br />6. We recommend the portal areas be reclaimed by placing and <br />compacting the excavated material using conventional earthmoving <br />operations. We recommend compaction to at least 90 percent of <br />standard Proctor maximum dry density. The moisture content of the <br />material is not considered critical, sufficient moisture should be <br />available to achieve compaction. It would be preferable to place the <br />backfill material at or below optimum moisture content to reduce <br />settlement and increase the strength of the compacted material. We <br />believe compaction should be applied to layers on the order of 8 to 12 <br />inches in thickness. <br /> <br />LORENCI70 COAL COMPANY, LLO <br />CTLR 25,861 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.