My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-04-21_PERMIT FILE - M2000002 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2000002
>
2000-04-21_PERMIT FILE - M2000002 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 12:51:02 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:57:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/21/2000
Doc Name
ADEQUACY ISSUES LAFARGE INC TANABE PIT M-2000-002
From
DMG
To
TOM SCHREINER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Arsenal property, plume sizes and contaminant concentrations are steadily declining and can be <br />expected to abate to acceptable levels some time in the coming years. <br />B. Status of groundwater testing <br />The operator has not submitted test results for any of the cited contaminants. The regulations do <br />not evidently require notice of contaminants, if such are present. However, the regulations do <br />require a statement, under Exhibit G at (l), (2)(a), (2)(b), and (2)(c) of the Permit Application, <br />saying whether groundwater systems will be afY'ected and how such effects will be managed. <br />C. Need for an NPDES discharge pennit. <br />As indicated by the operator and its representatives, the company is aware that water discharged <br />to waters of the state will need to be regulated through an NPDES or CDPS permit. The operator <br />has indicated that application for such permit is being prepared. <br />D. Potential for withdrawal of off-site contaminants through aumoing. <br />It appears from first principles that groundwater extraction for mining in the proposed area could <br />locally affect the flow of groundwater, which has been .identified as containing DIMP, <br />potentially causing that water to report to the gravel operation's pumping system. Provided there <br />are contaminants still in the plume, the operator would need to handle such water in a manner <br />compatible with required measures to protect human health and the environment, and to effect <br />compliance with discharge regulations [o surface water. Withdrawal of contaminated water from <br />the plume is not, per se, an issue regulated by the Division of Minerals and Geology. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />It is recommended that the Operator consult EPA or US Arnty documents and determine <br />current contaminant levels of D[MP and TCLEE in and around section ] 0. which contains <br />the operation. All well monitoring information for DIMP and TCLEE in Section ]0 and up <br />[o '/< mile outside section 10 should be evaluated. <br />2. Provided DIMP or TCLEE in concentrations exceeding drinking water standards occurs in <br />any of the wells cited in Recommendation 1, the operator determine whether such <br />contaminants will be collected via the mine pump system, and how such contaminants will <br />be handled prior to discharge. <br />3. Provided DIMP or TCLEE in concentrations exceeding drinking water standards occurs in <br />any of the wells cited in Recommendation 1, it is recommended that the operator report the <br />health risks associated with withdrawal of such contaminants. At a minimum, the operator <br />should furnish to the Division an MSDS report on each of the contaminants found in the <br />groundwater contaminant evaluation cited in Recommendation 1, above. <br />cc: Carl Mount <br />Bruce Hwnphries <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.