My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE125214
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE125214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:40 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:36:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/1/1997
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 05 Cultural Resources Report 8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />• Company with regard to Native American consultation, unless new situations or conditions azise, <br />or human remains aze discovered. If other tribal representatives do contact MAC about the project, <br />their interests and concerns will be accommodated within the scope and deadlines of the present <br />plans for continuing archaeological investigations and mine development. <br />National Register District <br />The SHPO has indicated that the project azea and prehistoric sites have potential for <br />designation as a National Register District (James Hartmann, SHPO, personal communication: letter <br />to Kent Gorham, Division of Minerals and Geology, Mazch 21, 1997). At the time of this writing, <br />no communication has been received from the Division of Minerals and Geology, Mined Land <br />Reclamation Boazd, indicating whether pursuing this designation will be a condition of the mine <br />permit. However, if it does become a condition, the following observations and recommendations <br />apply: <br />A district designation is appropriate given what appeazs to be a focused yet time transgressive <br />pattern of exploitation of acorn and/or piiion nut resources, as reflected by the vast majority of sites <br />already discovered at the mine project azea (McKibbin et al. 1997). These sites, considered <br />individually, do not possess the qualities that would cause them to be considered eligible for the <br />National Register. Even among all the sites which have been test excavated, there are none that aze <br />recommended eligible in their own right. Their archaeological value, though, lies in the aggregate <br />. assemblage of sites as it reflects this appazent consistent, resource-focused, and long-standing <br />subsistence pattern. The district would include the procurement sites, as well as possible residential <br />or logistical base camps that are presumed to be present and associated with this activity. The <br />former site type occurs very commonly on the upland terrain of the project area, and the latter site <br />type is expected to be present on the neazby valley floors, though this site type has not yet been <br />conclusively identified. <br />The definition of the district boundaries should be made based on drainages and vegetation <br />patterns. It is recommended that this district include those portions of the Lorencito Canyon and <br />Cow Canyon drainages covered by the piiion and oak brush vegetation community. This vegetation <br />type exists both above and below these canyons on the south side of the Picketwire Valley, but the <br />district is recommended to be limited to these two drainages, since little archaeological information <br />is available for other areas. The district boundaries could be expanded as additional surveys are <br />conducted. <br />The evaluation of individual sites within the district would change. The district itself would <br />become eligible to the National Register under criterion "c" since it "represent[s] a significant and <br />distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction" and criterion "d" for the <br />information potential contained in the aggregate site assemblage. Sites within the district, most of <br />which are presently considered not eligible, would be re-evaluated as either contributing or non- <br />contributing properties within the district, and it appeazs probable that most sites could be considered <br />• contributing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.