My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE124948
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE124948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:27 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:15:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• equipment fleet. The conditions in determining the bond is to establish the maximum <br />financial exposure in the life of the project during which the Division would exercise its <br />rights to reclaim pursuant to bond forfeiture. These costs and associated activities are <br />shown in Appendix 5-7. <br />In order to establish the bond, it is necessary to understand the mining operation which <br />has been explained in Section 2.05.1 through 2.05.3. At maximum exposure under the <br />Development scenario, the largest pit will have been opened with the most volume <br />moved to the fill area. Map 5-6 shows the maximum disturbance scenario with the <br />lazgest "open pit" for the planned mine life. The maximum open pit will require a <br />maximum of 850,000 cubic yards of fill to reclaim to Division requirements, which <br />will be pushed to the pit. <br />As the pit expands to the north, it will progressively become smaller and smaller, as <br />can be seen from the cross sections. The moving pit concept uses newly mined <br />materials to be placed at the south end of the steady-state pit. <br />The bonding calculation uses a wncept of the optimal post mining land use with the <br />best operational and cost effective method of reclamation of the "worst case" scenario. <br />The details of the reclamation plan under the bond forfeiture scenario has been set forth <br />in Appendix 5-7. <br />• Ba~/Jiug and Crnding <br />A plan for backfilling with reference to time, has been discussed above in Subsection <br />(a) and is illustrated on Final Reclaimed Topography Map 5-4 and Geologic Cross <br />sections A through X. Backfilling will be accomplished by the use of dozers pushing <br />overburden/spoil from the benches into to the final excavated pits as much as possible. <br />Much of the overburden will be hauled directly from a new bench cut to the backfill <br />pit. These operations will require the use of one 988B Caterpillar End Loader, two to <br />four 773B Caterpillar Trucks, one D-9HJD-8K Caterpillar Tractor dozer and one 637D <br />Caterpillar Scraper. The plan for bacldlling and grading is different during normal <br />reclamation procedure versus the bond forfeiture scenario of reclamation. <br />The post-mining topography shown on Map 5-3 will achieve approximate original <br />contour. In order to ensure compliance, the applicant will incorporate a verification <br />plan into the permit application. OEI will submit a map, on an annual basis when <br />actively mining, showing the topography of azeas reclaimed during the preceding year. <br />This map will be submitted as part of the Annual Reclamation Report. <br />The applicant has an approved permanent realignment of the Carbon Junction Canyon. <br />This realignment constitutes a permanent diversion of surface flows subject to Rule <br />2.05.3(4). Therefore, the applicant has submitted a detailed plan prepared by or under <br />• <br />Technical Revision 08 (v 1.3) 5-23 Revised 9/1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.