My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE124935
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE124935
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:26 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:12:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/8/2004
Section_Exhibit Name
1.0 Introduction
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Therefore, additional spoil regrade calculations are unnecessary as this would be the worst case <br />condition of spoil reclamation with respect to affected regrade widths. <br />Dozers woukt do the backfilling and grading as this is the most cost efficient equipment other than <br />draglines given the average distances calculated. Caterpillar D11N dozers were selected as the most <br />efficient equipment to complete the regrading task. A lerier from Wagner Equipment addressing the <br />availability of D11's is included in Appendix A. In the area where D and E pits come together, scrapers <br />will replace much of the material due to longer distance material movement. Similarly, regrade in G pit <br />requires a significant amount of scraper work to facilitate the regarding process. Scraper fleet size and <br />production rates were determined with TALPAC software. <br />Pits will be backfilled using spoil material currently available within existing spoil rows associated with <br />each plt. Appendix A provides appropriate cross sections of existing and regraded post-mine topogra- <br />phy. <br />1.4.1.2 Roadway Rearading <br />For purposes of estimating reclamation cost, three types of roads have been identified at Trapper Mine <br />and they are access, haulage, and dragline walk roads. These roadways are designed and constructed <br />• to minimize amounts of cuss and fills which therefore minimizes the amount of backfilling and grading <br />that would be necessary to return them to a satisfactory contour. Caterpillar D10R dozers were selected <br />as the cost efficient equipment given the average distances calculated. These push distance <br />calculations and volume calculations for the roadways are based on the typical cross sectional areas. <br />These areas were applied to projected road lengths during the worst case year of 2004 as shown on Map <br />M9. From these values, times as shown in Table 1.4-5 were calculated. Costs were also included for <br />ripping haulroads using a material seismic velocity of 5000 fps. <br />Trapper is careful not to introduce materials on roads that will require removal at a later date. That is <br />specifically why we have not pursued the use of ash on haul roads. Roads are constructed of earthen fill <br />and sub-base material wfth gravel on top, Scoria may also be used if available. These inert materials <br />are easily graded during reclamation, covered with topsoil and do not adversely affect the growth of <br />vegetation. Post mining land use requirements are not compromised. <br />Drainages affected by road fills include East Buzzard, Far East Buzzard, Coyote, No-Name, Johnson, <br />West Pyeatt, Midtlle Pyeatt, East Pyeatt, Grouse, Sage, Oak and Flume. <br />i-40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.