Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lloyd V. "Buck" Barnhart <br />}533'.fix~iAgtaa~$;d, /Pueblo, Colorado 81001 / (303) 542-9207 <br />3 Sedum Court Office 543- <br />December 3, 1920 <br />tlr. Jim Schmieding ,~ ~1' ~' - ~` ~98~ <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />423 Centennial Building MINED LEI.ND RECLA4dP.~!DlJ <br />1313 Sherman Street D~iJ D~,~• ^, N~}n r_I U:~o~_r^or <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 J <br />Re: Your letter, 10/31/80 <br />NALCO/Lamar East Pit <br />Your File ;l 77-572 <br />Dear Jim <br />After discussion with George Gregg„ NALCO/Lamar manager, we have dQaeloped <br />the following proposed plan for the unbonded area east of the tracks. The <br />idea is to bond Stages III, IV and V of Part 1 (13.37 acres total) as major <br />disturbance. The remaining Stage I and II and VI of Part 1 and Stage V, <br />Part 2 will not be disturbed for quite a few years. The timetable for this <br />undisturbed area has not been determined, and we do not wish to modify the <br />original at this time. <br />Now let me address the separate points of your letter: <br />1. "These areas have never been reclaimed in conjunction with the Mtning <br />Plan which must be done before the operation can proceed." <br />PSining is not complete in the area west of the tracks. However, baclcsloping <br />has been started in portions of the mined area. <br />2. "The mining stapes are in the wrong sequence and the operator ma:~ want <br />to reconsider them." <br />For purposes of this revision, the operator requests that Stages II _, IV <br />and V Part 1, east of the tracks, be consolidated into 1 pareel.The origin- <br />ally proposed timetable on these three stages should be deleted and revised <br />to 1980 to 1995 for the combined 13.37 acre parcel. <br />Bonding <br />The operator would agree with your proposed $1,000.00 per acre band for the <br />13.37 acres as major disturbance area. Tliis would require additional. bond- <br />ing in the amount of $13,370.00. <br />If this constitutes a Technical Revision as per Bule 1.9, please consider <br />this letter as application for such revision. The changes proposed appear <br />to fall in the guidelines. The entire area has been permitted. The changes <br />will have no effect on reclamation except for the change in tie® sequence. <br />The operator will submit the additional bonding when requested. Call me if <br />there are any questions. <br />Co Tally <br />~ Lloyd V. "Buck" Barnhart <br />Consultant/NALCO, Lamar <br />cc: NALCO/Lamar <br />