My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE124855
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE124855
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:22 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:06:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/21/2005
Doc Name
Master List: Exhibits 1-209 Exhibits 15-19
From
City of Black Hawk
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum to Corey Hoffmann <br />November 14, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />approach is consistent with the DMG regulation (Rule 6.4.7(5)) that requires an operator <br />to apply for a discharge permit when `necessary'." (Emphasis added.) Rule 6.4.7(5) was <br />misquoted by the Applicant above. Rule 6.4.7(5) actually states: "The <br />Operator/Applicant shall affirmatively state that the Operator/Applicant has acquired (or <br />has applied for) a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit <br />from the Water Quality Control Division at the Colorado Department of Health, if <br />necessary." (Emphasis added.) In this case, it is clear that a CDPS (a.k.a. "NPDES") <br />permit is necessary. The Permits Unit of the Water Quality Control Division (WQCD), <br />in its July 28, 2005, letter to the Division, stated that minimally, the operation would <br />require a CDPS storm water permit, and may also require a CDPS process water <br />discharge permit. The Applicant appears to have misinterpreted this rule as allowing it to <br />apply for a CDPS permit 30 days prior to starting operations, rather than at this time, as <br />the Rule actually requires. A commitment to apply for a permit at a later date clearly <br />does not meet the requirement that the Applicant must have applied for or obtained such <br />a permit riot to submitting its application fora 1 12 reclamation permit. <br />The Applicant states in its September 14, 2005, Response to 3`d Adequacy Review that it <br />"will provide written demonstration of an approved CDPS discharge permit prior to any <br />offsite discharge and prior to the initiation of any blasting and quarry activities at the <br />MMRR Quarry." We believe it is important to condition the 112 permit so that the 112 <br />permit is not effective until the Applicant has actually obtained a valid CDPS permit. <br />4. Proposed condition: The Applicant shall, prior to initiation of quarrying activities, <br />obtain a gravel pit well permit or other well permit as applicable, from the Offce of the <br />State Engineer, as required by the State Engineer's September 15, 2005, Response to <br />Reclamation Permit Application Consideration, and shall comply with all other conditions <br />set forth in said State Engineer's September 15, 2005, Response. The Applicant shall <br />comply with all water rights statutes and regulations, including but not limited to C.R.S. § <br />37-92-101, et seq. Any groundwater exposed during mining operations shall not be used for <br />mining operations except through an approved Substitute Water Supply Plan or decreed <br />augmentation plan. Water conveyed from the property via drainage shall not be used for <br />mining operations except through an approved Substitute Water Supply Plan or decreed <br />augmentation plan. Any stormwater intercepted as a result of mining operations shall be <br />released within 72 hours, or the Applicant shall obtain an approved Substitute Water <br />Supply Plan or decreed augmentation plan. Prior to the use of any water for dust <br />suppression and/or reclamation/revegetation purposes, the Applicant shall identify the <br />source of the water and shall provide documentation that the water was obtained from a <br />legal source, or the water was diverted in priority under a water right decreed for such <br />industrial use, and submit such information to the Division with a copy to the Office of the <br />State Engineer. <br />Board Jurisdiction: Rule 3.1.6(1)(a) requires that disturbances to the prevailing <br />hydrologic balance and to the quantity of water in surface and ground water systems be <br />minimized by measures including, but not limited to, compliance with applicable <br />LEONARD RICE ENGINEERS INC. <br />2000 CLAY STREET, SUITE 300, DENVER, COLORADO 802 7 1-51 1 9 • PHONE (303) 455-9589 • FAx (303) 455-01 1 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.