Laserfiche WebLink
Blast Vibration Analysis: Proposed MMRR Quarry <br />Page 2 <br />(c) where such structure is a utility, the Applicant may supply a notarized <br />' letter, on utility letterhead, from the owner(s) of the utility that the mining <br />and reclamation activities, as proposed, will have "no negative effect" on <br />_ their utility. <br />Thus any DMG applicant that does meet the criteria of 6.4.19 Exhibit S (a) must comply with <br />paragraph (b) and demonstrate that its activities will not adversely impact all significant, valuable <br />and permanent man-made structures within its zone of influence. Clearly this includes the BHCCSD <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant, its treatment appurtenances, and associated instrumentation aswell as <br />the SDMD lighting structures. <br />On behalf of Clear Creek District Water Providers, LLC, Lyman Henn Inc. submitted a preliminary <br />Geotechnical Engineering Services Report for the proposed MMRR Quarry to Banks and Gesso, <br />LLC and the Colorado DMG on August 19, 2005. DMG reviewed that submittal and provided <br />Adequacy Review Comments (3`d) to the applicant via Banks and Gesso, LLC on September 12, <br />2005. In that review, DMG outlined a number of compliance options to assure that quarry operations <br />will not damage offsite manmade structures. <br />The September 12~' DMG response notes "[T]he ground vibration limitations imposed by <br />compliance with any of the above four listed compliance options are designed to prevent damage as <br />slight as the aggravation of existing minor cracks in plaster." This constraint reaffirms a DMG <br />requirement cited in a January 25, 2005 Adequacy Review of the proposed quarry that stated, <br />"[S]ince the development and production blasts will generate a low frequency (less than 40 hertz) <br />component of ground vibration ,DMG will require that peak particle velocity (PPV) be less than <br />0.75 inches per second (ips) at structures not owned or controlled by the quarry operation and less <br />than 0.5 ips at any older structures with plaster-on-lath walls that may be within the zone of influence <br />of quarry blast ground vibrations." <br />These PPV criteria originate in the 1971 U.S. Bureau of Mines study Blasting Vibrations and Their <br />Effect on Structures, Bulletin 656. The Blasting Level Chart appended to the September 12`h DMG <br />response derives from that report. As noted above, the 0.75 ips and 0.5 ips PPV limits are intended <br />to prevent damage in drywall and plaster-on-lath walls respectively in residential structures. <br />However, man-made structures [as defined in CMR I.1(98)] present within the proposed MMRR <br />Quarry's zone of influence represent far more sensitive receptors than wood-framed residential <br />housing. <br />Subsequent sections of this report will describe the nature and operations of the BHCCSD <br />Wastewater Treatment PSant and the SDMD lighting on State Highway 114 near the proposed <br />MMRR Quarry. It will also identify certain sensitive receptors within the wastewater treatment plant <br />and associated with the lighting fixtures. Finally, it will provide a geotechnical evaluation and detail <br />potential impacts to the sensitive receptors from blasting operations at the proposed quarry. <br />©Leonard Rice Engineers, Inc. November 10, 2005 -Job No. 1086BCS03D <br />