My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE124690
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE124690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:13 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:54:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/11/2001
Doc Name
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES INC FREDSTROM SITE 112 2ND ADEQUACY REVIEW M-2001-016
From
ROCKY MTN CONSULTANTS INC
To
DMG
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT D H L
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~UN-11-2001 MON 09;03 AM ROC~MTN CONSULTANTS FAX N0. 3056959 P. 02!03 <br />• III IIIIIIIIIIIII'll <br />_ _ _ 999 ~_n_c <br />ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC, <br />Premiere Building <br />825 Deloware Ave., Sulte 500 <br />Longmont, CO 80501 <br />(303) 772-52a2 <br />Metro (303) 665-6283 <br />FAX (303) 665-6959 <br />(ilfst initlOl. last nomB)~Iong.rmcCO.COm <br />lone l l , 2001 <br />Mr. Thomas A. Schreiner <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Sneet, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Aggregate Industries, Inc. EYedstrom Site -112 2'd Adequacy Review #M-2001-016 <br />Dear Mr. Schreiner. <br />Followittg is our msponse to the questions you raised in yow adequacy review. <br />6.4.4 F.XIiI.l31T b - Miaiae Plan <br />The operator will provide adequate flood control and mitigation for this site. The applicant will <br />submit a copy of the Boulder County Flood Hazard Development Permit (FHDP) to the DMG <br />when it is approved. The purpose of this pennit is to ensure that permanent structures are safe <br />from flooding and that the groposal complies with the Boulder County Bode and Federul Emergency <br />Management Agency standards. We understand that if the floodplain development permit modifies <br />the existing proposal that it will be considered a moditication to the 112 permit. <br />6.4.8 EXHIBIT H - Wildlite Information <br />2. T met with the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CROW) on-site on Thursday, May 31, 2001. !have <br />not yet received their comments. We will continue to work with the CDOW going forward. <br />6.4.12 E_XHI&IT L -Reclamation Cost <br />3. The applicant has committed to Boulder County that only 1 pod or portions of 2 podv and the <br />processing area (including the settling ponds) will be disturbed at any time. Therefore, the applicant <br />does not wish to bond for maximum disturbance of Phases 5 and 6. Aggregate wishes to bond for <br />the phase of mining that includes the largest area that will be disturbed at one time to calculate the <br />potential reclamation liability. This will occur during phase 6. the dewatering trench will be at its <br />maximum size, the processing area, silt ponds (phase 3 mining area) and haul roads will be disturbed <br />and shoreline reclamation will be in process for Phase S. It is anticipated these disturbances will <br />total approximately 51 acres. Exhibit L illustrates the acreages and quantities used for Ilte <br />reclamation cost calculation. As we discussed on the phone, the cost for mobilizing equipment is <br />included in the contractor mobiliation ($20,033) cost. <br />CIVIL ANf) FN\/IDf1N~AGI,ITn, Ca/"~.~rrno.r, ..• ..~----~- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.