My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE124644
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE124644
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:11 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:50:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1989120
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/12/1990
Doc Name
FILE M-89-120 PLATTE VALLEY PIT ADEQUACY LETTER
From
MLRD
To
TUTTLE APPLEGATE INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> of ~o~ <br />- <br />Department of Natural Resources ~~~ <br />~~q <br />` <br />e"~ <br />o <br />1313 Sherman Si., Room 275 „ <br />` <br />n <br />Denver. CO 90203 ' ~^ L;/ ~"r <br />303 866-3567 •~~~' <br />' <br />' <br />Fax: 303 f32-8106 rata <br /> Roy Romer, <br /> Governor <br /> Fred R. Barra, <br /> Dnrisian Deenor <br />FROM: Michael J. Boyd, Reclamation Specialist~'~ ~ <br />RE: File No. M-89-120, Platte Valley Pit, Adequacy Items <br />DATE: March 19, 1990 <br />T0: Mike Applegate <br />John Doe1•fer and I have reviewed the responses provided on February 20, 1990 <br />to the Division's adequacy concerns. Our comments are provided below. These <br />are noted according to the numbering system used in the February 7, 1990 <br />adequacy letter. <br />3. Nave you obtained an agreement with CCWCD regarding use of their ditch <br />in connection with your dewatering operations and/or relocation of <br />tFleir wells? If not, please provide additional information regarding <br />your proposed alternative, particularly the size and location of arty <br />proposed settling pond(s). <br />4. The response to the question on whether water has been secured to fill <br />the proposed reservoir is based on: <br />(1) The applicant intends to file for junior storage rights for winter <br />diversions when other senior reservoirs cannot divert because of <br />ice blockage of their delivery system, <br />(2) Much transbasin and wastewater effluent is available for the <br />taking, and <br />(3) Recent court filings show gravel pits as proposed reservoirs. <br />Ii; appears that you hold no water rights at this time, and that a <br />filing has not yet been made fora conditional decree. It is the <br />policy of the Mined Land Reclamation Board to require an alternative <br />rf~clamation plan in the application when no water rights are secured at <br />the time of submittal. The Division recommends that you submit an <br />alternate reclamation plan and bond for the costs attributable to this <br />plan if they are higher than the currently proposed bond amount. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.