My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE124204
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE124204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:21:49 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:23:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1996008
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/6/1996
Doc Name
WESTERN GRAVEL INC PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NORTH R-34 PIT
From
WESTERN GRAVEL INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ .-r <br />~ ~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depdnmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman }L, Ruum ? 1 5 <br />Denver, CuluraAn RU!11 f <br />Phone: U031 R66-7567 <br />FAX: 17031 R 1'!-H 106 <br />April 25, 1996 <br />~~ `:i <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Rcy Romer <br />Governor <br />Mr. Michael D. Stanton lames S Lochhead <br />Executive Direuor <br />Quaternary Envronmental Consulting <br />1210 South Park Drive o..h o~ o.,p nor <br />Monument, CO 80132 <br />WESTERN GRAVEL, INC., NORTH R-34 PIT, FILE NO. M-96-008, REGULAR 112 <br />CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION <br />Dear Mr. Stanton: <br />On April 24, 1996, I received your response to my letter addressed to Western Gravel, Inc. <br />regarding their application fora 112 Constriction Materials Reclamation Permit for the North <br />R-34 Pit, File No. M-96-008. <br />Although, I do not have correspondence from the Applicant, naming you as an agent or as the <br />permitting contact regarding this application, I will respond tb your questions. <br />Exhibit :the application forms provide sample notices. I appreciate and understand that I had <br />the Certified Mail cards as proof of a mailing, however, without a copy of the notice that was <br />mailed or a statement from the recipient regarding what they had received, I have no way to <br />determine what the content of that mailing was. Therefore, my original request remains. <br />Exhibit S: the rules require that every exhibit be addressed and even empty exhibits should be <br />noted so that the reviewer is not left wondering if it was an oversight. <br />The grace period for using old forms only coveted the acceptance of the forms themselves. We <br />still have the requirements for all the necessary exhibits as outlined in the new rules which <br />became effective on January 2, 1996. <br />Regarding publishing, it should only be undertaken when this Office has found an application <br />to be complete, a determination to be made by the reviewer, not the applicant. I agree that this <br />point may not be entirely clear in the rules and in fact is to be subject to some rule changes for <br />clarification in the neu future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.