My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE123872
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE123872
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:21:33 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:01:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY BASELINE GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR THE H-G MINE
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX R
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Each of the seven new wells have been monitored quarterly field chemistry <br />(pH, conductivity, and temperature, and further laboratory analysis. The <br />field measurements are presented in Table 8. Temperatures ranged from <br />7.5°C to 12.8°C, illustrating a generalized trend of warmer temperature <br />during the summer months. This is typical of shallow aquifers near their <br />recharge areas (outcrops). pH values are extremely high in a consistent <br />fashion suggesting a malfunction in the equipment. More realistic values <br />woul range from 6.5 to 8.5. Chemical qua ity was assessed through labora- <br />tory analysis of samples collected from the wells. The results of the <br />analysis are cumulatively summarized on Table 9. Statistical analysis <br />of ten quality parameters for each well and two springs have been pre- <br />sented in Tables 10 through 16 to assess qualitative seasonal variation. <br />Typically conductivities and total dissolved solids varied the most, <br />probably directly related to water temperature fluxuations and well <br />settlement. The remaining parameters analyized seemed to maintain rela- <br />tively constant, portraying baseline conditions. When the quality of <br />water is compared to livestock drinking water and irrigation standards <br />• (Tables 17 and 18). The following results are recognized: <br />• The groundwater quality for all seven wells exceed the minimum <br />lead concentration requirements for livestock drinking water <br />• All of the wells, SP-3 and SP-5 exceed recommended magnesium <br />limits for irrigation water <br />• Well LC-4 and UC-3 exceed recommended aluminum levels for <br />irrigation during the May 1930 sampling but these same wells <br />did not exceed the aluminum limit during the remainder of <br />the year <br />• Recommended manganese limits for irrigation are exceeded in <br />all of the wells <br />• Wells LC-4 and UC-3 exceed recommended limits of selenium <br />concentrations for irrigation water during the August 1930 <br />sampling. <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.