Laserfiche WebLink
i '~-er tr~ei~ty ~en~ror ~amtmssion <br />;,,-• - --._ntation of the <br />:;.~., rr._- ?.~rcr~Salinity Standards <br />?rc_;;- ~th^ P.?DES Permit Program <br />_~-"~~~1: t'arch 7, 1978 <br />ive: Flay 10, 1978 <br />-3- <br />;. <br />(b) Description of quantity and qualt- <br />ty of proposed discharge. <br />(c) Description of how sal*.s removed <br />from discharges shall be disr;+s~d of <br />to prevent such salts from entc:-ing <br />surface waters or ground water aquifers. <br />(d) Costs of alternative plays in <br />dollars per ten of salt re:-ove?. <br />(5) Of the alternatives, a stag..-.:.t as to the <br />one plan for reduction of salt discharge that <br />the applicant recommends be adopt~_'. <br />(6) Such other information pertinent to <br />demonstration of non-practicability as the <br />permitting authority may deem neccss.ary. <br />c. In determining what permit condition; shall be <br />required, the Departrr,~nt of Health shz~l consider, <br />• but not be limited to the follev~ing: <br />(I) The practicability of achie•~ing no dis- <br />charge of salt. <br />(2) Where no-discharge is deter~i^.d not to <br />be practicable: <br />(a) The impact of the total prcp~sed <br />salt discharge of each alte~•~-.tive on <br />the loV:er msinstem in terms nr both <br />tens per year and concentr~ti~n and <br />the economic impact of the ir:~r~es~d <br />salt load. <br />(b) Costs per ton of salt re..-:•;ed <br />from the discharge for each plan z1- <br />ternative. <br />(c) Capability of minimizing salinity <br />discharge. <br />(3) With regard to both points, ore and ttvo ,: ,. <br />above. the compatibility of Colorz!~ water laws <br />with either the complete eliminatic~i of a salt <br />discharge or arty plan for minimizing a salt <br />discharge. <br />