My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE123541
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE123541
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:21:17 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 11:39:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/19/2001
Doc Name
ADDITIONAL ISSUES TO BE COVERED BY THE MLRB WHEN CONSIDERING THE MINING PERMIT FOR THE LINE CAMP GRA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />was run as if we all knew what the other had written to the DMG. Which is not true. Though we <br />have become acquainted because of our common goal, we DO NOT read each other's mail. <br />There seems to be, throughout this permit process, the attitude that everyone involved in these <br />mining operations are trustworthy, if you tell them what's expected of them they'll comply. Well, <br />you and I know that this is NOT the way a lot of people handle responsibility. All you have to do <br />is put a 5 year old in charge of the cookie jar and you'll get the normal human response.... the <br />cookies will disappear at an alarming rate. It is this FACT of human behavior that concerns all <br />who attended this meeting. <br />Additionally, when discussing the areas which the MLRB is responsible for, it was quite <br />shocking to discover that there is no testing of water prior to the permitting of a mining <br />operation. How can one be responsible for the quality of the groundwater and NOT have any <br />baseline data that concerns that groundwateR If this mining operation pollutes MY well (which <br />is only 60 feet deep and approximately 400 feet from the property line) who is responsible? <br />Your own department is charged with the quality, shouldn't they be the ones who gather <br />baseline data? Why should I have to pay for something that is fine now, but could be changed <br />by your board's decision to allow this operation? Especially when your own statutes state <br />"you're the one"? <br />Finally, it was reported by someone at the meeting that Mr. Gillis and Mr. Erickson were <br />seen having "brunch" with the applicant. If this is true, would that not be considered just a little <br />unethical? No one invited the protestors of the permit to lunch. This kind of behavior is what <br />we've been dealing with ever since the struggle began. It's hard to fight the "good of boys" who <br />are entrenched in this area. Makes me wish I'd never left the big city where there weren't so <br />many of'em... <br />Aggrieved and disappointed, <br />Pete and Cheri Robinson <br />PO Box 85, Dolores, CO 81323 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.