My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE123403
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE123403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:21:10 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 11:29:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/7/2001
Doc Name
Objection CASE S H MINE
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 3 <br />I have major concerns regarding the wet lands in the applicants <br />permit. It has been relatively dry over the past few years, but ther is <br />no question multiple areas of wet lands exist in the areas requested for <br />mining. The applicant has completely ignored these wet lands and is bold <br />enough to state a permit from the U.S. Corps of Engineers is not required. <br />This is ridiculous. <br />This would also have a substantially negative impact on the existing <br />wildlife and would adversely affect this habitat. The Platte River runs <br />along the west and north side of this property. Deer, eagles and hawks, <br />owls, ducks and other species live in this habitat. <br />There are statements in the application also regarding the flood <br />plain. This entire area is in the 100 year flood plain. As recently as <br />three years ago, hundreds of these acres were flooded and inaccessible for <br />weeks. Approximately 25 years ago, this entire area was flooded and under <br />water. The river banks in the spring erode regularly, and the river path <br />continues to change significantly. Forty acres of river bank were lost <br />four years ago during spring flooding. Please do not allow the applicant <br />to minimize the historical., real flooding that regularly occurs in this <br />area. This entire area is indeed located in a flood plain. This appears <br />to be a direct violation to the weld County comprehensive plan. <br />My family has retained one-half of the oil and gas royalties on the <br />property now owned by Mr. Tom Sharkey. There are approximately 43 existing <br />oil and gas wells currently in production. At least another six or seven <br />wells have yet to be drilled (some of these because of wet land restric- <br />tions incidently). I have major concerns regarding the ability to maintain <br />and optimize the current oil and gas production as well as future drilling <br />and redrilling operations. There is currently considerations and plans for <br />well spacing capabilities to be changed to every 20 acres. Thus, my <br />financial interest and ownership interests in the oil and gas wells seem <br />to be in jeopardy here. <br />Finally, there is essentially no significant quantity of land proposed <br />for reclamation by the applicant. All the mined area will be multiple <br />lakes (767 acres) and essentially only the banks of these lakes will be <br />reclaimed, which is a total of only 64 acres of the entire area. <br />The scale and size and scope of this proposed operation is hugh. This <br />is one of the largest single pieces of agricultural land that remains in <br />the immediate front range. It is beautiful open space that requires your <br />help to survive. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.