Laserfiche WebLink
Lorenciro Canyan Mine -Wildlife rerhnicaf Report <br />• The diurnal surveys were conducted in conjunction with other field procedures. Generally, <br />potential breeding territories were identified from repeated observations of birds in a specific area. <br />Once a potential territory was identified, attempts were made to locate a nest. If a nest was <br />located, it was monitored through the breeding season. Attempts to locate nests included ground <br />and aerial checks. Nests were field checked for activity in May 1996. <br />The auditory census involved driving areas of potential habitat after dark and playing taped calls <br />of owls potentially occurring in the area. The auditory census was conducted in May 1996. Stops <br />for tape playback were at approximately 400-m (0.25 mile). Playback of calls progressed from <br />the smallest owls to the largest. This order was used to avoid alarming the smaller owls. Areas <br />were owls responded were recorded on project base maps. <br />Breeding Bird Survey <br />Birds other than raptors within the permit area were sampled using a line transect method. This <br />method was selected over the more commonly used strip transect sampling method (i.e. Emlen <br />transects) for three reasons. First, line transect sampling has a sound theoretical framework <br />involving rigorously-developed, well-founded estimation methods (Burnham et al., 1980). Most <br />other estimation methods are ad hoc approaches developed with no theoretical basis (Burnham et <br />al., 1981). <br />• Secondly, many factors of concern in most strip transect approaches can be safely ignored during <br />analysis of line transect data if a suitably "robust" estimation procedure is used (Burnham et al., <br />1981). These factors include things that influence the detection of birds. Weather, habitat, bird <br />species, and observer differences are examples most commonly cited in the literature. <br />Consequently, no adjustments, such as coefficients of delectability, are necessary. <br />Third, all birds away from the centerline do not have to be detected to provide valid estimates. <br />Even if a substantial fraction of the birds go undetected, a properly conducted line transect survey <br />will provide valid estimates of density (Burnham et al., 1981). In contrast, a fundamental <br />assumption of strip transect sampling is that all birds within the strip will be detected. <br />A total of five transects were established in four major habitat types. Transects were established <br />in the following types: grassland (1), oak pinyon (1), and conifer forest (3). Blocks of habitat <br />within accessible areas that could accommodate minimum transect lengths of 800 m (2640-feet) <br />were randomly selected. Transects were laid out using a compass and tape measure. Each <br />transect was marked at 20-m (66-foot) intervals to facilitate location of birds in relation to the <br />transect. <br />Transects were all conducted in the same manner. Each transect was walked at approximately 1 <br />km/hr (0.6 mph). Observed birds were located, identified to the extent possible, and the <br />perpendicular distance from the transect to the birds initial location estimated to the nearest meter. <br /> <br />Wildlife 675/December 9, 1996 4 <br />