PERMFILE123157 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. Has the Applicant provided an appropriate blast vibration analysis and blasting plan demonstrating that off-site azeas will not be adversely affected by biasing? At issue are potential damages to: the Black Hawk/Central City Sanitation District's Waste Water 'Treatment Plant, sewage lines to the Cleaz Creek Convenience Store (owned by Cleaz Creek Convience LLC) San, Silver Dollar Metro District light poles, and utility lines along Colorado Highway 119 (Rules 6.4.4(1) and 6.5(4) ) Has the Applicant identified all significant, valuable, and permanent man-made structures within 200 feet of the proposed affected land? (Rule 6.4.19 -Exhibit S) 4. Has the Applicant accurately identified and located on a map all surface and groundwater resources on the affected land and adjacent lands that may be affected by the proposed mining operation? (Rules 6.4.7 - Exhibit G and 6.4.3(f) -Exhibit C) 5. Has the Applicant submitted a brief statement or plan showing how water from de- watering operations or runoff from the disturbed areas, piled material and operating surfaces will be managed to protect against pollution of surface water (and, if applicable, control pollution in a manner that is consistent with a water quality dischazge permit), both during and after the operation? Specifically, are potential impacts to North Cleaz Creek identified? (Rule 6.4.7(2)(c)) 6. Has the Applicant provided an adequate assessment of the disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land and of the surrounding area and to the quantity and quality of water in surface and ground systems? (Rule 3.16). Specific issues are: • potential for contaminants to enter the interconnected fractures supplying the - _- - .--- - - ---- --water to the neatbyweils impaetingwaterquaiity~ ------- • potential for reduced yield from the wells; • potential for uranium mineralization to enter ground water via blasting and mining activities; and • an adequate monitoring program to ensure the protection of surface and groundwater resources. Has the Applicant demonstrated compliance with applicable Colorado water laws and regulations governing injury to existing water rights? (Rule 3.1.6(1)) 8. Has the Applicant stated how it will comply with applicable groundwater performance standazds? (Rule 3.1.7) 9. Has the Applicant adequately described the game and non-game resources, including threatened and endangered species, on and in the vicinity of the application area, and provided a description of the impacts to such resources during mining and reclamation, and appropriate mitigation measures? (Rule 6.4.8 -Exhibit H)