My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE122726
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE122726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:40 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:42:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
m2004044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/4/2004
Doc Name
Notice of Pre-Hearing Conf and Formal Public Hearing
From
DMG
To
B. Michl Lloyd
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Engineers. These and other governmental agencies are contacted on a case-by-case <br />basis for comments on the application. as may be appropriate. <br />THE 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT PROCESS: <br />Upon receipt of an application, the Office makes an administrative determination <br />that the application contains sufficient information for the application to be <br />considered administratively filed. Once an application is considered filed, the <br />Office~has 90 days to complete its adequacy review of the application and to make <br />its decision to approve or deny the application. Any application denied by the <br />Office is automatically set for a Board hearing. During the adequacy review <br />process, the Office examines each Exhibit in the application to verify that all the <br />requirements for an Exhibit, pursuant to the'Act and Rules, have been adequately <br />addressed. Where inadequacies in an Exhibit exist, the Office sends an adequacy <br />letter to the Applicant requesting that the inadequacies identified by the Office be <br />addressed. <br />Where there are no objections to an application, only the Applicant may extend the <br />application review process beyond the 90`~ day decision date. If an application is <br />not adequate, and the decision date is not extendedby_the Applicaz~t,the_Office <br />may deny the application. Extensions beyond the 90`s day decision date may not <br />extended past 365 days from the date the application was considered filed. If an <br />application reaches the 365` day, and Office adequacy issues remain, the <br />application maybe scheduled for a Boazd hearing to approve or deny the <br />application. <br />If the Office receives an objection to an application, the application is <br />automatically set for a Boazd hearing. Once the Office makes a fording that an <br />application is filed, the Board must make its decision to approve or deny the <br />application by the 120' day, unless the Applicant extends the decision date. <br />Again, the extension may not exceed 365 days beyond the filing date. <br />Provisions of the Act require that an application be automatically approved if <br />the office does not make a decision on the application by the 90`~ day, or by <br />the Board, where a timely objection is received, by the 120a' day, unless those <br />dates are extended or waived by the Applicant. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.