My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE122701
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE122701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:39 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
POSTMINING LAND USE
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX O
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
$12,238/shrub clump - 46 acres/shrub clump = $266/acre <br />Desirable forage shrubs planted between clumps cost $103/acre <br />Total cost/acre for shrub reestablishment = $266/acre + $103/acre = $369/acre <br />• <br />The total estimated cost/acre to satisfy a minimum wildlife cover need with mature <br />shrub clumps (without considering mortality) is about $370. This compares favor- <br />ably with an estimate of from $530 to $620/acre to reestablish 400 shrub stems/acre <br />(without considering mortality) (Table 4). <br />The costs in Table 4 were darived from historic costs at Trapper Mine and costs <br />prcvided by plant material vendors. At 400 shrub stems established per acre <br />(disregarding r_crtality) the cost to reestablish shrubs is from 67% to 85% of the <br />total seeding and planting costs. <br />Satisfying a shrub clump standard would cost about $81,000 less per acre at Trapper <br />Mine than reestablishing premine shrub densities on the two different mountain <br />shrub range sites. <br />The proposed shrub establishment standards based on wildlife cover needs provide a <br />raasorable and practical approach for the Trapper Mine.. They should benefit wild- <br />. life and domestic Livestock producers while enhancing watershed management and con- <br />trolling costs. 4~ere pre and post-mine land uses and conditions differ from those <br />at Trapper Mine, different standards may be more appropriate. <br />It is important to keep in mind that the objective of any reclamation program <br />should be to serve the defined post-mining land use, not to reestablish a vegeta- <br />tion type. Moreover, while incidental wildlife use may occur, it should not be <br />considered a basis for modifying the reclamation program for areas where population <br />limiting habitat does not exist. <br /> <br />• <br />-23- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.