My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE122701
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE122701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:39 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
POSTMINING LAND USE
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX O
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The western portion of t-he Williams Fork h!ountains, including part of the mine <br />plan area, is considered critical winter range far elk by the U.S. Fish and Wild- <br />life Service (1978). Pellet group data (Table 3) do show increased usage of the <br />~• mine plan area during winter months. Aerial surveys have also been used to eval- <br />uate trends of elk usage cf the proposed mine plan area anal adjacenC areas during <br />winter months. Table 2 illustrates tl~e minimum average number of big game sight- <br />ed in the mine plan area an+l zdjacent areas. Aerial ce:isus data indicate that <br />the mina plan area and adjacent areas are utilized by e1!c during winter months <br />(Tably_ 1) and the use is eenerally concentraC.ed on the north facing slopes of the <br />area. Appror.i:aately three-fourths of this arcs consists' of cp+antain shrub vege- <br />taCive type. Boyd (1970) in his stur!y of the [Trite giver elk herd, found winter <br />use greater in rnuuntain shrub communities than in any other vegetative type. <br />Boyd also found that 57 percent of elk forage during win~_er months consists of <br />browse species with oakbrush (Quercus~ambellii) being first among wood species <br />consumed. Other forage species included aspen CPopulus tremuloides), service- <br />berry (A.velanchier alnifolia), big sagebrush (Artemisia t=identata), and snow- <br />berry (Symphoricarpus utahensis). However, during the severe winter of 1978- <br />1979, elk concentrated and wintered in the Big Bottom area north of the Trapper <br />Mine in fully exposed meadows where there were no shrubs at all. <br />. The mine plan area does provide for elk winter use. Boyd X1970), however, found <br />that oakbrush having more than 51 percent density (of cover) physically excludes <br />elk from entering. Much of the mountain shrub conwunities within or adjacent to <br />the proposed mine plan area are made up of dense thickets of over-mature plants <br />in densities greater than 51 percent. As a result, elk camcentrate where access <br />to forage and available browse exists in discreet units scattered across portions <br />of the proposed mine plan area. In other words, only a small portion of the <br />shrub production in dense stands is actually accessible fc~r use by elk. Fewer <br />shrubs would therefore be likely to increase available forage for elk winter <br />use. <br />Sage Grouse <br />Sage Grouse are rarely observed within the mine plan arem. If the species is <br />found in mountain shrub, it is usually at a location surrmunded by sagebrush or <br />adjacent to sagebrush. This kind of habitat occurs primarily in the west one- <br />• third of the mine plan area. Ab 'estimate is available fa,r [he number of binds <br />-19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.