My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE122701
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE122701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:39 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
POSTMINING LAND USE
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX O
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As Tables 1 and 2 indicate, mule deer concentrate nn the wr_s[ern portion of the <br />mine plan area and the area just west of [he mine plan area during the winter <br />months. As snow depth increases, deer are forced f~.~rther west onto the Iles <br />Mountain area or the south facing slopes of the Williams Fork Mountains south of <br />• the mine plan area. Snow depth is a major influence oii r.~ule deer activity. <br />Loveless (1967)found that snow depths of 10 to 12 inches seemed to impede move- <br />ments of mule deer and that depths of 20 to 24 inches essentially preclude the <br />animals' use of an area. Gilbert et al. (1970) found that snow deeper than 18 <br />inches essentially precluded mule deer use. Snow course data for the Trapper <br />Mine mine plan area, Table 3, reveal that cn L'he overage snow is generally at <br />least deep enough to i,.pede deer moveTants and is cften deep enough to preclude <br />deer use on a:uch of the proposed trine plan area. Obviously during severe win- <br />tors, snow depths are greater than average and severely restrict deer use. <br />As snow depths accumulate in late February and 1•!arch, deer usage usually <br />increases on the south facing slopes south of Trapper's mine plan area. Aerial <br />surveys of these areas do not effectively illustrate this fact. This may be due <br />to L'he roughness of the terrain, pinyon-juniper vegetation type, the low visibil- <br />ity of deer and the short critical use period of this area by mule deer. Occa- <br />sional mild winters permit deer to browse the north facing slopes of the mine <br />plan area, thereby reducing the grazing pressure on vegetation on the south Eac- <br />• ing slopes. Prior to heavy snows each winter and soon after major thaws, deer <br />use on the north facing slopes increases, reducing pressure on the south facing <br />elopes of the Williams Fork Mountains. <br />The definition of critical or important winter range therefore excludes almost <br />all areas affected by Trapper Mine. The snow depth data demonstrate that the <br />mine plan area is not accessible for deer use in severe winters. It is possible <br />that establishing more fortis and grasses on the reclaimed areas which would be <br />available for spring, summer, fail and occassional winter wildlife use, might <br />improve the ability of wintering deer herds to survive oii nearby critical range. <br />ELK <br />Elk are common residents of the mine plan area in the late fall, winter., and <br />early spring. On an area-wide basis, however, elk use of the mine plan area is <br />relatively low. The elk using the mine plan area typically spend ttie summers in <br />• -16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.