My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE122701
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE122701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:39 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
POSTMINING LAND USE
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX O
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• REESTABLISIi`f[;NT OF SHF:UBS AT THE TRAPPER MINE <br />by H. B. Hump}iries, W. E. Sowards, 6 L. W, Iienderson <br />Statement of the Problem <br />Regulations subsequent to the Federal Surface h:iuing Cont.r.~l and Reclamation Act <br />of 1977 and the Colorado Surface Coal Afining Reclamation: Act of 1479, require <br />coal mine operators to reestablish woody plants shrubs) t;o a density at least <br />90X of the density on an approved reference area. The: Colorado regulations <br />allow for a variance f;om the reference area standard if v;*_ can be shown that a <br />greater or lesser shrub density will better sevve the post-mining land use. <br />Because there is little information quantifying the influrences of shrub densi- <br />ties on rangeland utility, it is difficult to justify and diefine a variance even <br />when the need is obvious. <br />• Shrubs ate generally replaced on mined lands <br />wildlife. Any shrub reclamation standard, ho <br />consideration for not only wildlife habitat, <br />well, i.e agriculture and watershed. In many <br />equally serve all post-mining land uses with a <br />to provide forage and cover for <br />sever, should: be established with <br />but other us3es of rangelands as <br />instances, it is not possible to <br />given shrub cBensity standard. <br />In the past, shrub density standards have frequently been s;et to either reflect <br />pre-mine vegetation conditions or to optimize wildlife use:. These approaches <br />fail Co consider if [he pre-mine conditions were optimum fo~c wildlife and ignore <br />how shrub densities influence other rangeland uses. In the? first approach, the <br />objective becomes the reestablishment of the pre-mine plant communities and not <br />necessarily the establishment of vegetation that best serves the post-mining <br />land use. In the second instance, the reclamation is desigmed for a single land <br />use, i.e. wildlife habitat. <br />The need to select proper shrub reclamation standards is madle more acute by the <br />high costs of establishing shrubs. At Utah International Ln:c's Trapper Mine <br />• <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.