Laserfiche WebLink
Rule 2.05 <br />. Previous findings by the MLRD in conjunction with mine permit renewals confirmed operator compliance <br />with the requirements of Rules 2.04.11, 2.05.6(2) and 4.18 regarding protection of fish and wildlife <br />resources. <br />2.05.613) Protection of Hydrologic Balance <br />The surface water quantity and quality portions of the initial pemut application can be found in Section <br />2.04.7 (Volume I), Appendix I (Volume IV), Appendix L (Volume V) and Appendix S (Volume VIII). Appendix <br />E, Volume III contains the original sediment control plan developed by M-K. Surface water quality data <br />for the smaller drainages aze given in Exhibit AA and CC of the volume exti<led Exhibit II. The original <br />NPDES permit and baseline monitoring plan are compiled in Appendix K (Volume IV). The original <br />surface water monitoring plan was described in Section 2.05.6(3). Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(10), Protection of the <br />Hydrologic Balance, was revised and updated by HGCC as part of the ]986 permit renewal process, and <br />submitted to the MLRD in November 1986. The current surface and groundwater monitoring programs <br />are described in Section 4.05.13 of this document. Results of the monitor well, spring and surface water <br />sampling program aze presented in Annual Reclamation Reports. For convenient reference, copies of the <br />Annual Reports for 1990 through 1994 azea provided in Appendix E. These reports include water <br />monitoring data from 1987 forwazd. <br />The DMG relieved HGCC of their surface water and groundwater monitoring requirements as part of the <br />paztial Phase II/Phase III bond release. Supporting documentation is found in Attachment D of TR-68. <br />Surface Water <br />Regulaz monitoring of surface water quality in Hayden Gulch since final reclamation was completed (1987) <br />. has not indicated any significant changes in water quality. TDS levels at the Upper Hayden Gulch site <br />have varied from about 540 to 850 mg/1 with no apparent wend. The pH has remained essentially <br />constant in the 8.0 to 8.5 range. Heavy metals and trace constituent levels do not appeaz to present any <br />problems. TSS has varied from 2 to 104 mg/l with no readily appazent cotrelaton between TSS values <br />and flow rates. Estimated flow values have ranged between 0 (no flow) and 1.0 cfs, in appazent response <br />to yearly snowpack and seasonal precipitation conditions. <br />Water flows in Lower Hayden Gulch appeaz to have increased over pre-mine levels as flows at this site <br />are now perennial and were ephemeral prior to mining. Estimated flow rates range from 0.01 cfs to 1.0 <br />cfs, with some apparent response to snowmelt and rainfall conditions. TDS levels have varied from 646 <br />to 2748 over a nine year monitoring period, with the predominant constituents being sulfate, sodium, <br />calcium and bicarbonate. The pH has remained fairly constant with a range of 75 to 8.5. As with the <br />Upper Hayden Gulch samples, TSS concentrations have varied substantially; from less than 1.0 mg/1 to <br />310 mg/l, with no apparent correlation to flow although the higher values were usually observed in the <br />Fall. Heavy metals and trace constituent levels appear to be acceptable. No obvious trends or significant <br />changes in water quality have been observed. <br />HGCC revised the hydrologic impact assessment as pazt of [he Phase II/Phase III bond release <br />application. The assessment indicated that recent water quality (1994-1997) was similaz to that observed <br />between 1987 and 1994. The DMG's findings concurred with the assessment that the Hayden Gulch <br />mine had not adversely affected water quality. <br />Groundwater <br />Spo$ springs RSP-3 and RSP-4, shown on Map 3, Environmental Monitoring and Sampling Sites, have <br />been sampled every spring since 1987 and 1985, respectively. Flow rates aze estimated from visual <br />. observation and samples aze analyzed for an extensive suite of parametexs. TDS concentrations in RSP-3 <br />have ranged from 610 to 1004 with sulfate, calcium, bicarbonate and sodium the predominant <br />constituents. The pH has remained steady, ranging fzom 7.0 to 7.6 (held values). Estimated flows have <br />varied from less than 1 to 6 gpm. Data evaluation suggests that water quality has not changed significantly <br />since monitoring began and that Elow rates aze lazgely a function of snowpack depth and the speed of <br />spring snow melt. <br />2.05-15 Revised - G/01 <br />