Laserfiche WebLink
The holes would be drilled on National Forest Sys[em lands at reclaimed drill pad • <br />locations that had been previously used for coal exploration drilling. The reclaimed drill <br />sites proposed to be used, 96-27-1 and RAV-10, and are located in the NE1/4, NW 1/4 <br />Section 27 and S W 1/4, NW I/4 Section 26, 't 13 S, R 90 W, respectively. The drill hole <br />locations are shown on the attached map. The drill sites would be accessed using existing <br />Forest Roads 711 and 711.2b, to the location where an abandoned drill site access road <br />(West Flatiron access road) leads to the drill sites. The abandoned drill site access road is <br />proposed to be reopened for the project. The road has been closed to full-sized vehicles, <br />but has been left open to ATV traffic. Reopening this road would require snow removal <br />and some maintenance to clear rocks and debris from the prism, restore drainage <br />structures and remove a soil slump, some spot gravelling tnay also be needed. The <br />proposed road access is also shown on the attached map. <br />The GVBs would be drilled using truck mounted drill rigs. Drilling activities are <br />expected to last 60 to 70 days. <br />The GVBs would be completed on the land surface with a Lamson blower unit. The unit <br />would remain on site until mining has occurred under the GVBs it services, or until <br />mining passes out of the effective range of the blower unit. Access for at least weekly <br />monitoring would be needed for [he life.of the GVBs, estimated at this time to be about 2 <br />years. Access for required ma~itoring would be via ATV along a trail in Sylvester <br />Gulch, and via full-sized vehicle on FR 711 and 711.2b to the reopened drill site access <br />road. <br />After use each GVB would be plugged and abandoned according to Colorado State and • <br />USDI-Bureau of Land Management requirements, and each drill location will be <br />reclaimed. <br />III. SLOPING AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT <br />Public continents on the proposed action were invited by telephoning and using electronic <br />mail to contact local interest groups and permittees in the area. The informal scoping <br />period ended April 2, 2001. At the time the comment period was scheduled, Forest <br />Service personnel were not aware that the North Fork Coal Working Group (NFCWG) <br />had a regularly scheduled meeting on April 3. The Paonia District Ranger and District <br />Minerals Specialist attended the April 3, 2001 meeting of the NFCWG to discuss the <br />proposal and invite continents. A list of telephone and email contacts are contained in the <br />project £le. <br />Paonia Ranger District specialists were also provided input on the proposal. The District <br />Wildlife Biologist (DWB) indicated there would be no effects to threatened, endangered <br />or sensitive species (project file). The DWB also contacted the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife (CDOW) regarding winter range issues, and the CDOW responded that no <br />negative impacts would occur. The DWB raised concerns over reopening a road that had <br />been closed to full sized vehicles, and the need to ensure it was kept closed to preserve <br />wildlife habitat. • <br />