Laserfiche WebLink
<br />site visit by the BLM staff); and the injection fluid temperature was revised to allow temperatures <br />greater than 300° Fahrenheit. <br />When the Decision Record was issued for the Test Mine Plan, the interested parties assumed that the <br />COAs would be implemented and that the public interests would be protected by these COAs. I <br />realize there is a balance between facilitating the use of resources on public land (conservation) and <br />protecting these resources to the point they cannot be exploited (preservation). Yet, in the BLM's <br />role as stewards of public land revision of COAs without the public's knowledge or involvement <br />creates concerns about the BLM's commitment to implement the required mitigation for the <br />commercial mining project currently under consideration. It leads to the question, if American Soda's <br />commercial mine plan is approved and COAs established, can the public rely upon the BLM to <br />implement those COAs that are identified in the EIS. Some statement of policy and reassurance to <br />the public would be appropriate given the pattern shown in the Test Mine Plan. <br />Water Oualitv Issues <br />If my interpretation of the water quality data summarized below is correct, the mining method being <br />implemented by American Soda is impacting groundwater quality. Not only is the data itself <br />questionable, the implications of the data for American Soda's mining method is that significant <br />degradation of the Upper Aquifer has occurred from implementation of the Test Mine Plan. First, <br />fluoride values in the Upper Aquifer monitoring wells would seem to indicate that fluids from the <br />Lower Aquifer have been released into the Upper Aquifer. Second, when an isolated Total Dissolved <br />Solid (TDS) value such as 29,400 TDS (Well 20-5, 6-29-98) occurs in an aquifer that is supposedly <br />a designated Drinking Water Aquifer, it should ring bells and result in an immediate investigation as <br />to the cause of that value, be it a sampling or analysis error or a release of drilling fluid into the <br />affected area. Additionally, as shown in the graph developed by my investigations (attached to this <br />document), the monitoring data shows that the aquifers underlying the American Soda's mine area <br />are connected, not isolated. _ <br />The conununication between the aquifers beneath the mine site has very substantial consequences for <br />the potential environmental impacts of a commercial mining operation and these data and analysis <br />were not included in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) prepared for the commercial <br />mine project. It is absolutely essential that these monitoring data and all of the implications be <br />included in the analysis contained in a recirculated DEIS. <br />Commercial Viability <br />The goal of the Test Mine Plan was to validate the environmental consequences of American Soda's <br />untested mining method and also to demonstrate the commercial viability of this method. After two <br />years (80% of the time allocated to the Test Mine Plan under the BLM's Record of Decision in May <br />1997) and several test wells, American Soda has produced only 7,655 tons of sodium minerals. <br />Although an applicant has a right to risk money on a nonviable mining operation, it should not be <br />allowed to occur when significant environmental resources are also at risk. Has American Soda <br />2 <br />