My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121597
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:55 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:31:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/1/2003
Doc Name
Sedimentation Pond 017 Stability Analysis of Design Conditions
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Attachment 13-5G
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Deromber 2001 Sareea Coa! Campauy * Seneeu ]I W Mrne Sedlmentakon Pond 0017 Design S/,~brGty Analydt Dt <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />1.1 PURPOSE <br />The purpose of this stability analysis is to calculate the factor of safety (FOS) under static conditions for the <br />design conditions of Sedimentation Pond 017 embankment in order to document design compliance with <br />applicable regulatory standards under Rules 4.05.9 (6) and 4.05.9 (8) (b). <br />1.2 METHODOLOGY <br />The static FOS for Sedimentation Pond 017 was calculated using a basic, two-dimensional equilibrium <br />analysis program called SLOPE/W (Version 4.24). The calculated FOS is the ratio of those resisting forces <br />[hat would prevent embankment movement or failure to the corresponding driving forces. Resisting forces <br />include the internal svength paaameters for both the soil materials used in the conswction of the <br />embankment and the underlying base materials on which the facility will be constructed. Potential driving <br />forces include gravitational forces on the embankment and foundation materials and the gravitational and <br />lateral forces associated with the water volume that could be impounded behind the embankment. For this <br />analysis, a circular failure mode was assumed, and the FOS was calculated using the Bishop's method. <br />1.3 PROCEDURE <br />The design embankment cross-section used to evaluate embankment stability was determined from the <br />digitized topography shown on Drawing 13-SB, Attachment 13-SB of [he Seneca II W Permit (2001). A <br />water surface elevation behind the embankment of 7,391.9 feet above mean sea level (amsl) was used for <br />the analysis. This water surface elevation is equivalent to the elevation of the invert to the principal <br />spillway. <br />The embankment geometry analyzed is based on the design topography cu[ perpendicular to [he dam at the <br />tallest point relative to the downsveam topography. The embankment slopes used in the design are 3H:IV <br />and the crest length is 15 feet. The potential phreatic surface for the stability analysis is based on a water <br />surface elevation of 7,39].9 ft-amsl, three feet below the crest of the embankment. The phreatic surface <br />through the embankment was estimated based on Darcy's law and observation of similar homogenous pond <br />embankments at the mine site. A[ these locations seepage does not occur above the embankment toe. The <br />resulting surface is shown on the SLOPE/W computer printouts contained in Appendix B. <br />The closest site to Pond A where soil samples have been revieved is Pond 016. Pond 016 soils were used to <br />approximate conditions at Pond 017 since pond 016 is relatively close and is likely founded on similar <br />materials to those which will be found at Pond 017A. An undisturbed sample was collected from the <br />foundation area of Pond 016. The foundation soil sample was obtained from a Shelby tube sample. <br />Triaxial (with pore pressure), grain size and Atterberg limits tests were run on the sample and the results <br />can be found in Appendix A, and are summarized on Table 1. The results of these tests were used to <br />approximate the properties of the Pond 017 foundation conditions due to the relatively close proximity of <br />the two embankments. <br />During construction of Pond 016 embankment, fill material was sampled and subjected to sieve analysis <br />and Atterberg limit testing. The svength properties for the embankment fill were obtained from tests on a <br />sample from Pond 010. The Pond 010 embankment strength results were selected to represent the svength <br />properties of the Pond Ol7 embankment fill due to the similarity in index and sieve properties between the <br />sample from the Pond O16 embankment fill located near Pond 017 and the Pond Ol0.embankment fill (see <br />Table 1). The Pond 010 embankment shear strength test was performed on a remolded sample at 95% of <br />the maximum dry density from the standard Proctor test (ASTM D698). The results can be found in <br />Appendix A, and are summarized on Table 1. <br />The parameters described in Table 1 were input into the SLOPE/W program to evaluate static stability of <br />the Pond 017 structure and are shown in [he attached program printouts with associated results. <br />Momtgomrp~ WaUon NarZa, 0765 Soath Unian Bonlevarel, Suilr 4010 +Zlrkewaod, Co/arada 80218 * (303J 763-5740 <br />C\7F.h1P\PON17 17 Drngn STABIIII'Y.dor <br />05/02/01 eyin <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.