My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121316
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:44 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:15:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 39 MINE INFLOW ESTIMATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Getty Task 2 Page 28 March 1, 1983 <br />• 9 <br /> in approzimately 59 days. Using a distance of 800 feet end a days, <br />time of 5 <br /> a drawdown of 612 feet csa be calculated with Equation 8. The piezometric <br /> head at that location and time would be 6588, therefore. The elevation of the <br /> coal at this location is approzimately 6500 feet and the dr awdown caused by <br /> penetration of the second zone would be 88 feet. Since the h eed is less than <br /> the elevation of the top of the overburden aquifer, this value also represents <br /> the amount of drawdown that should be used to calculate the gravity drainage <br /> of the fault zone. Ta ble 3 presents results obtained for the second zone <br /> utilizing Equation 7. <br />Table 3 <br />Estimated liazimum Upward Flow Through Second Fracture Zoae <br />Time Since Upward Flow from Gravity Flow from Total <br />Penetration Underlying Fracture Miae <br />of Zoae Aquifer Zoae Inflow <br />-(days) (BPm) - - ~BPm) <br />- ~-(BPm)--- <br />1 -- - <br />28 -- <br />82 110 <br />7 11 31 42 <br />14 8 22 30 <br />30 5 15 20 <br />60 4 11 15 <br />90 3 9 12 <br />180 2 6 8 <br />360 2 4 6 <br />720 1 3 4 <br />As Table 3 ezhibits, the amount of inflow erpected from the second <br />fracture zone is dramatically less than erpected from the first such zone. It <br />should be noted that the total inflow to the mine is the sum of the values is <br />Tables 2 sad 3 for appropriate times, e.g. the inflow at a time of 60 days <br />after peaetrntion of the first zone is equal to 39 gpm from Table 2 plus 110 <br />gpm from Table 3. Although the additional drawdown caused by the penetration <br />of the second zone will cause the inflow at the first zone to decline more <br />rapidly than indicated by Table 2, the total inflow to the mine remains the <br />• sum of the valves in the two tables because the aquifer senses a total <br />drawdown of 700 feet at the second fracture zone. In other words, once the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.