My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121316
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:44 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:15:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 39 MINE INFLOW ESTIMATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Getty Task 2 Page 26 March 1, 1983 <br />underlying aquifer to the fracture zone and does not account for the drainage <br />of the fracture zone above the bottom of the Coal. <br />Although it is difficult to estimate the time and rate of gravity <br />drainage of such a fault zone, Equation 7 can be used to obtain as estimate of <br />the rate of drainage as a function of time. If it is assumed that the zone <br />can be approzimated as sn aquifer of unlimited eztent, the gravity drainage <br />through the ends of the zone (i.e. the fifty feet widths) can be estimated <br />(see Figure 9c). To perform this calcnlatioa it was assumed that the <br />traasmissivity of the zone was 100 sq. ft. per day and the specific yield is <br />0.10. Assuming that the fracture zone does not e:tead upward into the marine <br />shale, the valve of drawdown utilized in this calculation is equal to the <br />saturated thickness of the overburden aquifer or approzimately 100 feet. The <br />inflow length for this calculation is 100 feet. <br />Both calculations described above were performed for several times np to <br />( 720 days. The results of these calculations are presented in Table 2. <br />F______ _____'^ S e _____ ___ a <br />Table 2 <br />Estimated Mazimum Upward Flow Through Fracture Zoae <br />Time Since <br />Penetration <br />of Zoae <br />(days) <br />' -- IIpwaid Flow from- <br />Underlying <br />Aquifer <br />(gpm) <br />--- <br />- Gravity Flow from <br />Fracture <br />Zoae <br />(gpm) <br />- <br />= Total <br />Miae <br />Inflow <br />(gpm) <br />--- <br />1 -- <br />210 -- - <br />93 - <br />---- 3 03 ., i <br />7 79 35 114 - ~ <br />14 56 25 81 %' <br />30 38 17 55 r~ <br />I 60 27 12 39 "- <br />90 22 10 32 <br />1 180 16 7 23 <br />360 11 5 16 <br />720 8 3 11 <br /> <br />The data in Table 2 indicates that the inflow immediately after <br />penetration of the fracture zone is relatively large but rapidly declines as <br />• the head in the aquifer is decreased due to depressurization of the nude rlyiag <br />aquifer. It should be anted that the calculations performed assume that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.