Laserfiche WebLink
i[ <br />I <br />l <br />L <br />t <br />l <br />Getty Task 2 <br />Page 9 <br />hfarch 1, 1983 <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Aquifer Test Results <br />Hole Hydraulic Storage <br />Number Conductivity Coefficient <br />(ft/day) • <br />001-Fhf-1(S) 0.39 <br />008-77-58 0.495 <br />008-79-6 0.455 .0000112 <br />006-62-48A 0.032 <br />006-82-48B 0.09 <br />006-82-74A 0.278 .00077 <br />006-82-74H 0.035 • <br />006-82-74C 0.618 .001 <br />001-SW-7 0.401 .0003 <br />006-80-1 0.02 <br />021-82-47A 0.076 .000013 <br />021-81-12 0.001 .00000029 <br />021-81-26 0.008 .00046 <br />A table of me asnred piezome tr is head elevations was presented is the Task <br />1 report (Table 3-1, Task 1 Report). These values were used to construct a <br />poteatiometric map, Figure 1, for the overburden aquifer. It wss assumed that <br />this distribution of piezometric head represents the steady state conditions <br />for the aquifer sad values of initial head for the numerical model were taken <br />from Figure 1. <br />The computer program also requires the aquifer recharge/discharge amounts <br />and locations. Although the amount of recharge and discharge from the • <br />overburden squifer sre not known, Figure 1 provides insight into the location <br />