My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121301
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:43 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:14:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/30/2005
Doc Name
2nd adequacy review comments
From
dmg
To
banks and gesso llc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
velocity expected from each contributing watershed during the 100-yeaz,_ hour storm event. The <br />applicant will need to verify that all pemrarrent spillways and drainage channels aze designed to withstand <br />the peak velocity expected from such an event. For those applications where riprap installation will be <br />necessary, the applicant will need to provide the details for riprap sizing such as the riprap D 50 and <br />thickness of application. Please provide. <br />19. The March 15, 2004 Memo from Mike McDermid to Alex Schatz references the 10-yeaz, 24-hour <br />storm event as the design storm event for temporary drainage stmctures. Please provide an assessment of <br />the 10-yeaz, 24-hour storm; l0-yeaz, 6 hour storm; and 10-yeaz, 2-hour storm event for the watershed <br />encompassing the proposed MMRR quarry and indicate which storm event produces the highest peak flow <br />and conresponding peak flow velocity. The applicant will need to verify which of these storm events <br />produces the highest peak flow and velocity, and then provide the corresponding peak flows and flow <br />velocities for each contributing watershed used in the design of temporary spillways and/or drainage <br />channels. The applicant will also need to verify that any new drainage culverts (24" or 48") to be <br />installed aze designed to convey the peak flow expected from either a 10-year, _ hour or 100-yeaz, <br />hour storm event, whichever is more appropriate. <br />20. The March 15, 2004 Memo from Mike McDermid to Alex Schatz references 4 attachments, ie: <br />hydrology calculations, pit slope report, diversion channels design, road design pazameters. Please <br />provide these 4 attachments. <br />21. Blasting Plan -The applicant has indicated that a blast vibration analysis and the on-going blast <br />monitoring plan covering all affected azeas and structures will be submitted to the Division prior to <br />commencement of blasting. It is the Division's position that the blast vibration analysis and blasting plan, <br />per Rule 6.4.4(1), is an integral component of this application and must be provided with all of details <br />outlined in Allen Sorenson's January 25, 2005 Memo (see attached copy). The blast vibration analysis and <br />blasting plan must also include a detailed assessment of the possible surface and subsurface impacts, a <br />monitoring plan that will be used to detect the presence or absence of offsite impacts, and proposed <br />mifigation measures that will be implemented in the event a peak particle velocity of 0.75 ips is detected at <br />any structure not owned or controlled by the quarry operation, or a peak particle velocity of 0.50 ips is <br />detected at any older structure with plaster-on-lath walls that maybe within the zone of influence of quarry <br />blast ground vibrations. Please provide. <br />Uranium Mineralization <br />22. The applicant has proposed a Monitoring, Containment, and Control Plan to address the potential for <br />adverse impacts to human health, and the environment from uranium mineralization resulting from <br />quarrying activities and to ensure the operator's compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local <br />regulations. During the previous review period, the Division met with representatives from the Air Quality <br />Control Division and Radiation Management Program of the Colorado Department of Health (CDII) to <br />discuss the concerns expressed by I.L. Turner in reference to uranium mineralization from quarrying <br />activities. As a result of our discussion, it has come to the Division's attention that it may be more <br />appropriate for the Monitoring, Containment, and Control Plan to address the presence and impacts of <br />radioactivity rather than uranium. The Division has asked for more input and assistance from the CDH <br />specialists to assess appropriate monitoring requirements and protocol. We anticipate a response from the <br />CDH specialists by July 29, 2005 and will forwazd their comments to the applicant as soon as they become <br />available. <br />23. The applicant has proposed to "collect drill cuttings from at least one (1) representative sample point <br />and promptly perform assay work for uranium content." The Division has asked the CDH to advise <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.