My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121301
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:43 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:14:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/30/2005
Doc Name
2nd adequacy review comments
From
dmg
To
banks and gesso llc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MMRR 112 QUARRY APPLICATION <br />(FILE M-2004-06'n <br />List of Objections <br />1. "accuracy of the legal description of the permit area" <br />2. "the applicant is not in compliance with applicable local permits, licenses, and approvals <br />as the applicant does not have a Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) state <br />-----highway access-permittn~rue, «seeessfihesubjeetpreperty~nd-eonduettheirminiag- <br />operation" - - - - - <br />3. "location of newspaper of local circulation for publication & notifying nearby residettts" <br />4. "inaccurate listing of contiguous property owners (LL.&L.M.Turner)" <br />5. "the proposed operation cannot be conducted on the described property without proof of <br />legal access to the mining site, via a grading permit issued by Gilpin County" <br />6. "the applicant has failed to submit a proper application as the amended permit <br />application does not reflect the true post-mining land use of the property" <br />7. "the proposed mining operation is contrary to the laws or regulations of this state or of <br />the United States, including but not limited to all federal, state, and local permits, <br />licenses, and approvals, as applicable to this operation as the applicant has failed to <br />comply with Gilpin County's Special Use Review (SUR) Permit requirements" <br />8. "evaluation of uranium mineralization impacts to air, soil, & water from blasting" <br />9. "potential for uranium mineralization in blasting dusty' <br />10. "adverse impacts of blasting & rock movement, a plan for monitoring and protection of <br />nearby structures does not east" <br />11. "need for additional analysis and documentation of blasting procedures" <br />12. "potential for offsite blasting to endanger the structural integrity of the wastewater <br />treatment facility's large concrete tanks (containing untreated sewer water and <br />sludge) thereby creating an adverse catastrophic event to North Clear Creek" <br />13. "potential for the quarry project to create any adverse conditions through the Black <br />Hawk Fault thereby affecting the Black Hawk/Central City Sanitation District's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.