My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121203
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:39 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:10:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/23/2004
Doc Name
page 3-58 to 3-137
Section_Exhibit Name
3.0 Environmental Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Floods caused by snowmelt dominate the flood characteristics up to <br />about the 50-year frequency. Beyond that frequency, floods induced by <br />rain have the potential for the greatest discharges, Mountain streams <br />like North Thompson Creek are subject to flashfloods caused by local <br />thunderstorms in the narrow steep-sided valleys. This relationship is <br />similar to that found in a study of the Crystal River hydrology. <br />An analysis of low flow on North Thompson Creek using the USGS data <br />indicates a 10-year daily flow of approximately 0.2 cfs. This flow <br />may occur in the winter months and also in the late summer. Records <br />for the winter period may be affected by ice which causes low relia- <br />bility. <br />Snowmass began monitoring streamflow on North Thompson Creek on June <br />26, 1981, at the upstream and downstream stations located on Figure <br />3.6,1.2-1, Flow measurements are made manually by wading the stream <br />and measuring velocities with a current meter; depths are measured <br />• using a top-setting rod. Flow values for North Thompson creek as <br />measured by Snowmass are listed in Table 3.6.1-12, <br />These values follow the flow patterns observed at the USGS gaging sta- <br />tion. Below normal precipitation during the 1980-81 winter resulted <br />in peak runoff that was less than normal, The downstream site shows <br />an increase in flow over the upstream site during high flow, This can <br />be attributed to the increase in watershed area. During baseflow, no <br />difference was observed. <br />In addition to the flow information developed from the USGS gaging <br />station, crest stage recording devices were installed upstream and <br />downstream of the mine site in 1980. High snowmelt runoff destroyed <br />the downstream device and partially damaged the upstream one during <br />the spring of 1980, It was possible to make an indirect flow <br /> <br />3-68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.