My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121003
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:31 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 8:59:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 54 DETAILS ON ABANDONMENT AND SEALING
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN January., 1986 <br />MT. GUNNISON N0. 1 (NINE . <br />Rock Properties - R~~ck properties for the F seam coal and the layers in the roof <br />and floor were taken from Mt. Gunnison core test data. The shear strength were <br />reduced from the un~:onfined to compressive strength, and discussed ~in the <br />Reference 2, and estimated as half of the compressive strength. The roof and <br />floor layers consists of shale, siltstone and sandstone. The strenyth of rock <br />layers increases consistently away from the F seam openings. But the strength <br />data within five feet of the mine opening, the strengths of which are low, were <br />used in the design ~rnd the strength properties are summarized in the Table <br />3.5.2.72. <br />The strength propert:ies presented in the Table 3.5.2.72 were determined from the <br />laboratory tests and may not represent actual field conditions where fractures <br />could be present. ''o be conservative in the design a scaling factor of 4 was <br />used to estimate they rock shear strength from the laboratory values.. This scale <br />factor is conservative when compared to the recommended scale factors by W. A. <br />Hustrulild, Reference 2. <br />Seal Dimensions - Using the design forces with a safety factor of tFiree (Table <br />3.5.2.71) and with z~ minimum shear strength of 500 psi (which was sealed down <br />four times lower thz~n the laboratory values), the seal dimensions were <br />determined. The sez~l dimension estimates for different locations were taken <br />based on the design curves shown in the Exhibits 3.5.2.E3 through 3.5.2.E5. <br />The design curves show a relationship between the shear perimeter length, which <br />is the perimeter of the mine opening at seal location and require seal lengths <br />for various shear strengths. The shear perimeter length for the proposed mine <br />opening of 8 feet high and 20 feet wide is 56 feet. <br />Removal of the loose and fractured material around the location of the seal will <br />increase the seal shear perimeter length. In selecting the seal length a shear <br />perimeter length of 80 feet was used for all the locations which is almost 40 <br />percent higher than the proposed mine openings. The seal dimensions at <br />3-86 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.