Laserfiche WebLink
Ecological Site ID Rating Bogish Pit <br />Tables -Ecological Site ID <br />Summary by Map Unit -Logan County, Colorado <br />Soil Survey <br />Area Map <br />Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Rating Total Acres <br />in AOI Percent of AOI <br />24'. 93itt Altvau complai:; . R072XX062C0 _ - 28.3 60.7 <br /> <br />,'9:AU-25perceattslopes- <br />.= ..` , <br />I08 Stoneham-Cushman R067BY002C0 0.1 O.l <br /> complex, 3 to 9 <br /> percent slopes <br />10,9 <br />,,; 'F~edalmd-Kim R0678YW$CO ' : <br />Ot3 <br />: '1 22:U <br />, vrompl <br />9 td , ~ . <br />, <br /> ~s <br />`'?~ P~~ <br />118 Wages loam, 0 to 3 R072XYOO1C0 8.0 17.1 <br /> percent slopes <br />Description -Ecological Site ID <br />RF~EIVEI~ <br />FEB 1 6 2001 <br />Divlslon of Reclamano~,, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Ecological site [D is an identifier that uniyuely identifies a particular ecological site. An "ecological site" is the product of all <br />the environmental factors responsible for its development. It has characteristic soils that have developed over time throughout <br />the soil development process; a characteristic hydrology, particularly infilvation and runoff that has developed over time; and <br />a chazacteristic plant community (kind and amount of vegetation). "fhe hydrology of the site is influenced by development of <br />the soil and plant community. The vegetation, soils, and hydrology are xll interrelated. Each is influenced by the others and <br />influences the development of the others. The plant community on an ecological site is typified by an association of species <br />that differs from that of other ecological sites in the kind and/or proportion of species or in total production. Descriptions of <br />ecological sites aze provided in the Field Office Technical Guide, which is available in local offices of the Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (MRCS). <br />Parameter Summary -Ecological Site ID <br />Class: NRCS Rangeland Site <br />Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition <br />Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced [o a single value that represents [he map <br />unit as a whole. <br />A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil <br />entity, e.g., rock outcrop. For the attribute being aggregated, [he firs[ step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute <br />value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of [he aggregation process <br />derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic <br />map for soil map units can be rendered. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but <br />components are not. <br />For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding percent composition is recorded. A percent composition of 60 indicates <br />that the coaesponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical <br />factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. <br />The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values for the components in a map unit. For each <br />group, percent composition is se[ [o the sum of the percent composition of all components paructpating in that group. These <br />groups now represent "conditions" rather than components. The attribute value associated with the group with the highest <br />cumulative pemen[ composition is returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative percent composition, the <br />cortesponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower <br />or higher group value should be returned in the case of a percent composition tie. <br />t$Q4 nmo.t Bewv<n Web Soil Survey Ll 10/11211116 <br />"~ ravenrbo Serrlre National Cooperuive Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 <br />