My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE120717
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE120717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:21 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 8:41:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/5/2001
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Response
From
ENVIRONMENT INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ENVIRONMENT, INC. <br />APRIL 4, 2001 <br />PAGE 4 <br />reached. Remember PS&G plans to create the slopes as mining <br />progresses to keep the amount of backfilling necessary to a <br />minimum. Only the actual working face would need sloping as <br />explained in Exhibit S so the inert material would be placed <br />before the dredge shaped the slope. In the case of bank <br />armoring the material would be placed after sloping is com- <br />plete. Since dewatering of large areas is not allowed at this <br />time it would not be practical to build slopes with the inert <br />material. <br />7. I respectfully disagree with your statement that the soils <br />report indicates there is 12" of topsoil on the site. The <br />information presented by Mr. Norman Wells in his letter did <br />not name a specific topsoil depth for the mine site. The <br />supporting data sheets he provided are general soil descrip- <br />tions for the entire county and are not site specific. The <br />soils depth, from site specific observations, was stated on <br />page 12 paragraph 4 of the application and in part states ". <br />. average salvageable soil depth is 4 to 6 inches ". <br />This was a stated average intended to indicate there where <br />areas with more and less topsoil. For example, most of the <br />circle area in Sharkey's Lake, the Bluffs Lake and the High- <br />lands Lake areas contain little or no topsoil material. The <br />application then noted: "Never-the-less, what soils can be <br />salvaged will be stockpiled in perimeter areas and used in <br />resoiling when final grading is completed. There appears to <br />be more than adequate soils to meet the demand." As noted in <br />response #6 above, any resoiling to be done on areas where <br />inert material is used as fill will have a minimum of 12 of <br />topsoil placed over a base layer of finer materials. On <br />slopes that do not contain inert material, PS&G will place an <br />average of 6 inches as described in the application. <br />B. All ditches that are to be mined thru and are internal to the <br />site and do not serve adjacent property owners. <br />9. I understand this statement and refer you to the discussion in <br />my letter of March 30, 2001 addressing this point. <br />10. Attached is a large scale version of this map for your file. <br />There was a mistake in the legend that appeared to show the <br />cross hatched area as you describe. When the map was prepared <br />the background information was toned down so they did not <br />clash with the wetland delineation being shown on the map. <br />The legend was toned down inadvertently when printed and this <br />is corrected on the attached map. I have enclosed, copies of <br />two letters from Mr. Tim Carry of the US Army Corps of Engi- <br />neers clarifying 404 permitting requirement in the first 15 to <br />20 year of the mine life and addressing the new road location, <br />for the file. <br />The key statement to your request for placing 404 permitting <br />requirements in the permit is "If the reclamation plan re- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.