My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE120715
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE120715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:21 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 8:41:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
NH1 TAB 17 PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
negligible, because these structures have been designed to minimize impacts to the <br />• hydrologic balance (see Tab 13, Facilities). The diversions and culverts involve such <br />minor areas of disturbance that chemical and sediment changes in the flows will be <br />unmeasurable. <br />Effects of Runoff from Reclaimed Areas on the Quantity of Streamflow. The effects of <br />runoff from the proposed Nucla East mining area on Streamflow quantity (runoff and <br />sediment loads) have been estimated using the lumped-parameter computer model SEDIMOT II. <br />The impacts of runoff from reclaimed areas established at the Nucla Mine are inferred from <br />this modeling exercise. As previously mentioned, the absence of detailed premining <br />mapping, and also the lack of comprehensive soils and vegetation data for the Nucla Mine <br />prior to the onset of mining precludes the use of SEDIMOT II to obtain meaningful <br />premining estimates of runoff and sediment loads for comparison with postmining estimates. <br />SEDIMOT II has been developed to predict runoff and sediment loads from watersheds that <br />have been mined or are in the process of active mining. Input parameters take into <br />account precipitation, soils, topography and vegetation. Adjustment of these parameters <br />allows for the evaluation of watershed response changes resulting from mining. <br />• <br />Input parameters selected for the model reflect both premining and postmining (reclaimed) <br />conditions, and resulted in two separate model outputs: 1) premining runoff and sediment <br />loads; and 2) postmining runoff and sediment loads. Both outputs include runoff volumes <br />and rates (peak discharge), sediment concentrations and sediment yields. The following <br />sections discuss the scope of the modeling efforts, the selection of input parameters, and <br />a summary of the model results with corresponding significance determinations. The reader <br />should refer to the SEDIMOT II Manual on'Modeling Techniques (Wilson, et al., 1981) and <br />the SEDIMOT II User's Manual (Warner, et al., 1981) for reference. <br />The watershed area directly above the proposed 007 pond (Nucla East mining area) was <br />selected for evaluating runoff and sediment loads using SEDIMOT II. The small area <br />located in the southeastern portion of the Nucla East mining area that is drained by the <br />proposed diversion ditch was not included, as both the diversion and the sediment pond <br />will be removed after bond release (postmining conditions). Exhibits 17-1 and 17-2 <br />present the approximate drainage areas and respective topographies for both premining and <br />postmining conditions. <br />• <br />17-82 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.